Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A900
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/66cf9/66cf9a75906dc0e9f2d3d249d34bb9f3f9d5798c" alt="Ricoh GR Digital IV front Ricoh GR Digital IV front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0947/b0947af385e09995bd1e56c5e9e9356bb14ab574" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 front"
54 Imaging
66 Features
62 Overall
64
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Revealed September 2011
- Superseded the Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
- 25MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 895g - 156 x 117 x 82mm
- Released October 2008
- Updated by Sony A99
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A900 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A900, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Advanced DSLR by brands Ricoh and Sony. There is a sizable difference between the image resolutions of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and A900 (25MP) and the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and A900 (Full frame) posses totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The GR Digital IV was revealed 2 years later than the A900 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera and the Sony A900 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the GR Digital IV matches up vs the A900 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A900 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GR Digital IV & Sony Alpha DSLR-A900. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery & Sony A900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Sony A900
GR Digital IV | A900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2011 | ![]() | October 2008 | Fresher by 36 months |
Display resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 922k | Clearer display (+308k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A900 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
A900 | GR Digital IV |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sony A900
GR Digital IV | A900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A900 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry your camera frequently, you need to take into account its weight and volume. The Ricoh GR Digital IV has got outer dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Sony A900 has sizing of 156mm x 117mm x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") with a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A900 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose during that time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the GR Digital IV and the A900.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cf0be/cf0be5976bbc2b3f72e4f7fb33c75e58b57516c7" alt="Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A900 size comparison Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A900 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the GR Digital IV and A900 is 92 and 54 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f19b3/f19b34b5f374b331cd31ca407f0fb8485d9fbbdb" alt="Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A900 top view buttons comparison Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A900 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A900 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing just by looking at a spec sheet. The photograph underneath should provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR Digital IV and A900.
Clearly, both the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The GR Digital IV using its tinier sensor will make getting shallower DOF tougher and the Sony A900 will give you more detail because of its extra 15MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more recent GR Digital IV will have an advantage in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8eba6/8eba6b77751b84f452447cd03e1f7b83d6c19756" alt="Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A900 sensor size comparison Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A900 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A900 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c7eee/c7eee9a70b25f55ad5bcd20e3bf94372a2e55245" alt="Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A900 Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital IV | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh GR Digital IV | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
Revealed | 2011-09-15 | 2008-10-22 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 25MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 6048 x 4032 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/1.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 1,230 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Xtra Fine color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/250 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | None |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 190 gr (0.42 pounds) | 895 gr (1.97 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 156 x 117 x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 79 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1431 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 images | 880 images |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | DB65 | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32 |
Card slots | One | Dual |
Retail pricing | $599 | $2,736 |