Clicky

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony NEX-3N

Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
47
Overall
39
Ricoh GR Digital IV front
 
Sony Alpha NEX-3N front
Portability
89
Imaging
57
Features
52
Overall
55

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony NEX-3N Key Specs

Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
  • Introduced September 2011
  • Previous Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
Sony NEX-3N
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 16000
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 269g - 110 x 62 x 35mm
  • Introduced February 2013
  • Older Model is Sony NEX-F3
  • Newer Model is Sony a5000
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony NEX-3N Overview

Here is a complete overview of the Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony NEX-3N, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Ricoh and Sony. There is a substantial difference between the sensor resolutions of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and NEX-3N (16MP) and the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and NEX-3N (APS-C) posses different sensor dimensions.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The GR Digital IV was announced 17 months prior to the NEX-3N which makes them a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-3N being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before going straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the GR Digital IV scores against the NEX-3N in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Sony NEX-3N

 GR Digital IV NEX-3N 
Screen resolution1230k460kSharper screen (+770k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony NEX-3N over the Ricoh GR Digital IV

 NEX-3N GR Digital IV 
IntroducedFebruary 2013September 2011Fresher by 17 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen

Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sony NEX-3N

 GR Digital IV NEX-3N 
Manually focus More exact focus
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen sizing
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch screen Absent Touch screen

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony NEX-3N Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to carry your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and size. The Ricoh GR Digital IV offers external dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Sony NEX-3N has specifications of 110mm x 62mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") along with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).

Check the Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony NEX-3N in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached during that time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the GR Digital IV vs the NEX-3N.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony NEX-3N size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the GR Digital IV and NEX-3N is 92 and 89 respectively.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony NEX-3N top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony NEX-3N Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is hard to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing simply by reviewing specifications. The photograph underneath will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the GR Digital IV and NEX-3N.

Plainly, both of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The GR Digital IV with its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field tougher and the Sony NEX-3N will offer you more detail with its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The older GR Digital IV is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony NEX-3N sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Ricoh GR Digital IV
Portrait photography with Sony NEX-3N
41
focusing manually
saves RAW files
sensor resolution low (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
66
you can focus manually
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
cannot use external flash
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV as a Street photography camera
Sony NEX-3N as a Street photography camera
65
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
screen does not articulate
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
77
has a tilting screen
nice sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
no image stabilization
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV as a Sports photography camera
Sony NEX-3N as a Sports photography camera
34
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
better than average battery (390 per charge)
fixed focal length (28mm)
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
does not have phase detect AF
53
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
better than average battery life (480 CIPA)
slow continuous shooting (4.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Travel photography features
Sony NEX-3N Travel photography features
67
better than average battery (390 per charge)
has built in flash
good max aperture (f1.9)
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
71
better than average battery life (480 per charge)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
has built in flash
no Timelapse function
does not contain selfie friendly screen
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Landscape photography details
Sony NEX-3N Landscape photography details
53
focusing manually
good max aperture (f1.9)
decent sized screen (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
better than average battery (390 shots)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (28mm)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
70
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Sony E mount)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
better than average battery life (480 per charge)
no image stabilization
no Timelapse function
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Ricoh GR Digital IV
Vlogging with Sony NEX-3N
29
good max aperture (f1.9)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low video resolution (640 x 480 resolution)
no external microphone jack
28
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
no external microphone jack
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony NEX-3N Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sony NEX-3N
 Ricoh GR Digital IVSony Alpha NEX-3N
General Information
Brand Ricoh Sony
Model Ricoh GR Digital IV Sony Alpha NEX-3N
Class Small Sensor Compact Entry-Level Mirrorless
Introduced 2011-09-15 2013-02-25
Body design Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip - Bionz
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/1.7" APS-C
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 41.5mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3648 x 2736 4912 x 3264
Maximum native ISO 3200 16000
Minimum native ISO 80 200
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points - 25
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Sony E
Lens focal range 28mm (1x) -
Maximum aperture f/1.9 -
Macro focus distance 1cm -
Amount of lenses - 121
Focal length multiplier 4.8 1.5
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Tilting
Screen size 3" 3"
Screen resolution 1,230 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (optional) None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 1 secs 30 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter speed - 4.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.00 m -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual -
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash sync - 1/160 secs
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1920 x 1080
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 190g (0.42 pounds) 269g (0.59 pounds)
Physical dimensions 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") 110 x 62 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 74
DXO Color Depth score not tested 22.8
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.5
DXO Low light score not tested 1067
Other
Battery life 390 shots 480 shots
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model DB65 NPFW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) -
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC, Internal SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots 1 1
Price at release $599 $399