Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony NEX-3N
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
89 Imaging
57 Features
52 Overall
55
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony NEX-3N Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Introduced September 2011
- Previous Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 269g - 110 x 62 x 35mm
- Introduced February 2013
- Older Model is Sony NEX-F3
- Newer Model is Sony a5000
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony NEX-3N Overview
Here is a complete overview of the Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony NEX-3N, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Ricoh and Sony. There is a substantial difference between the sensor resolutions of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and NEX-3N (16MP) and the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and NEX-3N (APS-C) posses different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe GR Digital IV was announced 17 months prior to the NEX-3N which makes them a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-3N being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the GR Digital IV scores against the NEX-3N in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony NEX-3N Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GR Digital IV & Sony Alpha NEX-3N. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery & Sony NEX-3N Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Sony NEX-3N
GR Digital IV | NEX-3N | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1230k | 460k | Sharper screen (+770k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-3N over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
NEX-3N | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2013 | September 2011 | Fresher by 17 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sony NEX-3N
GR Digital IV | NEX-3N | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More exact focus | |||
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Absent Touch screen |
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony NEX-3N Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and size. The Ricoh GR Digital IV offers external dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Sony NEX-3N has specifications of 110mm x 62mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") along with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Check the Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony NEX-3N in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached during that time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the GR Digital IV vs the NEX-3N.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the GR Digital IV and NEX-3N is 92 and 89 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony NEX-3N Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing simply by reviewing specifications. The photograph underneath will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the GR Digital IV and NEX-3N.
Plainly, both of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The GR Digital IV with its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field tougher and the Sony NEX-3N will offer you more detail with its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The older GR Digital IV is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony NEX-3N Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital IV | Sony Alpha NEX-3N | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh GR Digital IV | Sony Alpha NEX-3N |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2011-09-15 | 2013-02-25 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4912 x 3264 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 16000 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/1.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 190g (0.42 pounds) | 269g (0.59 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 110 x 62 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 74 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1067 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 shots | 480 shots |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | DB65 | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $599 | $399 |