Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony NEX-C3
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
91 Imaging
56 Features
57 Overall
56
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony NEX-C3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Announced September 2011
- Superseded the Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1280 x 720 video
- Sony E Mount
- 225g - 110 x 60 x 33mm
- Revealed August 2011
- Superseded the Sony NEX-3
- New Model is Sony NEX-F3
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony NEX-C3 Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sony NEX-C3, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Ricoh and Sony. There is a big difference among the image resolutions of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and NEX-C3 (16MP) and the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and NEX-C3 (APS-C) offer different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe GR Digital IV was manufactured at a similar time to the NEX-C3 and they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-C3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting right into a full comparison, here is a short highlight of how the GR Digital IV scores against the NEX-C3 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony NEX-C3 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sony Alpha NEX-C3. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery and Sony NEX-C3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Sony NEX-C3
GR Digital IV | NEX-C3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1230k | 920k | Crisper display (+310k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-C3 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
NEX-C3 | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sony NEX-C3
GR Digital IV | NEX-C3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2011 | August 2011 | Same generation | |
Manual focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony NEX-C3 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR Digital IV offers outside dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-C3 has dimensions of 110mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sony NEX-C3 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the GR Digital IV against the NEX-C3.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the GR Digital IV and NEX-C3 is 92 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony NEX-C3 Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing just by going through specs. The graphic below should provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the GR Digital IV and NEX-C3.
As you can plainly see, both cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The GR Digital IV due to its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF more difficult and the Sony NEX-C3 will provide more detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images more aggressively.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony NEX-C3 Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital IV | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh GR Digital IV | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2011-09-15 | 2011-08-22 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4912 x 3264 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/1.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 121 |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 6.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 190g (0.42 lb) | 225g (0.50 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 110 x 60 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.2 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1083 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 photos | 400 photos |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | DB65 | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $599 | $343 |