Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony NEX-F3
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
86 Imaging
57 Features
60 Overall
58
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony NEX-F3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Revealed September 2011
- Replaced the Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 314g - 117 x 67 x 42mm
- Announced August 2012
- Old Model is Sony NEX-C3
- Refreshed by Sony NEX-3N
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony NEX-F3 Overview
Following is a in depth overview of the Ricoh GR Digital IV versus Sony NEX-F3, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Ricoh and Sony. There is a huge difference between the image resolutions of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and NEX-F3 (16MP) and the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and NEX-F3 (APS-C) come with totally different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe GR Digital IV was manufactured 11 months earlier than the NEX-F3 and they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-F3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a short view of how the GR Digital IV grades vs the NEX-F3 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony NEX-F3 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sony Alpha NEX-F3. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery and Sony NEX-F3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Sony NEX-F3
GR Digital IV | NEX-F3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1230k | 920k | Sharper display (+310k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-F3 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
NEX-F3 | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2012 | September 2011 | More modern by 11 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sony NEX-F3
GR Digital IV | NEX-F3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Absent Touch display |
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony NEX-F3 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera frequently, you should take into account its weight and size. The Ricoh GR Digital IV comes with outer dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Sony NEX-F3 has specifications of 117mm x 67mm x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7") with a weight of 314 grams (0.69 lbs).
Check the Ricoh GR Digital IV versus Sony NEX-F3 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are working with during that time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the GR Digital IV versus the NEX-F3.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the GR Digital IV and NEX-F3 is 92 and 86 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony NEX-F3 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its hard to see the contrast between sensor sizes only by reviewing specifications. The pic underneath should offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR Digital IV and NEX-F3.
To sum up, both of those cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The GR Digital IV featuring a tinier sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Sony NEX-F3 will offer you greater detail due to its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images much more aggressively. The more aged GR Digital IV is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony NEX-F3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony NEX-F3 Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital IV | Sony Alpha NEX-F3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh GR Digital IV | Sony Alpha NEX-F3 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2011-09-15 | 2012-08-16 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4912 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 16000 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/1.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 6.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 190 grams (0.42 lbs) | 314 grams (0.69 lbs) |
Dimensions | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 117 x 67 x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1114 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 images | 470 images |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | DB65 | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $599 | $470 |