Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A6300
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
83 Imaging
67 Features
82 Overall
73
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A6300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Revealed September 2011
- Previous Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Expand to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 404g - 120 x 67 x 49mm
- Announced February 2016
- Earlier Model is Sony A6000
- Updated by Sony A6500
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A6300 Overview
Below is a comprehensive assessment of the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sony A6300, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Ricoh and Sony. There exists a big gap among the resolutions of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and A6300 (24MP) and the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and A6300 (APS-C) possess different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe GR Digital IV was unveiled 5 years earlier than the A6300 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera and the Sony A6300 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going in to a more detailed comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the GR Digital IV matches up versus the A6300 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A6300 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sony Alpha a6300. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery and Sony A6300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Sony A6300
GR Digital IV | A6300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1230k | 922k | Clearer display (+308k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A6300 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
A6300 | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2016 | September 2011 | More recent by 53 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sony A6300
GR Digital IV | A6300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focus | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display size | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A6300 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and size. The Ricoh GR Digital IV offers outside measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Sony A6300 has specifications of 120mm x 67mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 404 grams (0.89 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sony A6300 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Here is the front view size comparison of the GR Digital IV versus the A6300.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GR Digital IV and A6300 is 92 and 83 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A6300 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to picture the gap in sensor measurements just by going through a spec sheet. The visual underneath should give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the GR Digital IV and A6300.
As you can see, both of these cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The GR Digital IV using its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field more challenging and the Sony A6300 will provide more detail having an extra 14 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older GR Digital IV will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A6300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony A6300 Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital IV | Sony Alpha a6300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh GR Digital IV | Sony Alpha a6300 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2011-09-15 | 2016-02-03 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | BIONZ X |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 6000 x 4000 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 51200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 425 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/1.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,230k dot | 922k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 11.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 6.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Rear Sync., Slow Sync., Red-eye reduction, Hi-speed sync, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 4K (3840 x 2160 @ 30p/24p), 1920 x 1080 (120p, 60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (24p) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 190 grams (0.42 lb) | 404 grams (0.89 lb) |
Dimensions | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 120 x 67 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 85 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 24.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.7 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1437 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 photographs | 400 photographs |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | DB65 | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | With downloadable app | |
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $599 | $889 |