Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony HX200V
92 Imaging
34 Features
47 Overall
39


66 Imaging
41 Features
55 Overall
46
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony HX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Introduced September 2011
- Succeeded the Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 27-810mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 583g - 122 x 87 x 93mm
- Announced May 2012
- Superseded the Sony HX100V
- Newer Model is Sony HX300

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony HX200V Overview
Lets look more in depth at the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sony HX200V, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Ricoh and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap among the resolutions of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and HX200V (18MP) and the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and HX200V (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor measurements.

The GR Digital IV was manufactured 7 months prior to the HX200V and they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera and the Sony HX200V being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going right into a full comparison, here is a concise summary of how the GR Digital IV matches up vs the HX200V in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony HX200V Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GR Digital IV & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery & Sony HX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Sony HX200V
GR Digital IV | HX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 922k | Sharper display (+308k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony HX200V over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
HX200V | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | May 2012 | ![]() | September 2011 | Fresher by 7 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sony HX200V
GR Digital IV | HX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony HX200V Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GR Digital IV provides exterior dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Sony HX200V has measurements of 122mm x 87mm x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") accompanied by a weight of 583 grams (1.29 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sony HX200V in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is a front view size comparison of the GR Digital IV compared to the HX200V.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GR Digital IV and HX200V is 92 and 66 respectively.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony HX200V Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to see the contrast in sensor sizing just by going through a spec sheet. The graphic here may give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the GR Digital IV and HX200V.
Clearly, the two cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The GR Digital IV due to its larger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Sony HX200V will show greater detail due to its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The older GR Digital IV will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony HX200V Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony HX200V Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital IV | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh GR Digital IV | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2011-09-15 | 2012-05-11 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4896 x 3672 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 27-810mm (30.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/1.9 | f/2.8-5.6 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,230k dot | 922k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | - | XtraFine TruBlack TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | Electronic |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 12.40 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 190 gr (0.42 lb) | 583 gr (1.29 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 122 x 87 x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 photos | 450 photos |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | DB65 | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $599 | $480 |