Clicky

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony HX200V

Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
47
Overall
39
Ricoh GR Digital IV front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V front
Portability
66
Imaging
41
Features
55
Overall
46

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony HX200V Key Specs

Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
  • Introduced September 2011
  • Succeeded the Ricoh GR Digital III
Sony HX200V
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 27-810mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
  • 583g - 122 x 87 x 93mm
  • Announced May 2012
  • Superseded the Sony HX100V
  • Newer Model is Sony HX300
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony HX200V Overview

Lets look more in depth at the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sony HX200V, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Ricoh and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap among the resolutions of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and HX200V (18MP) and the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and HX200V (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor measurements.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The GR Digital IV was manufactured 7 months prior to the HX200V and they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera and the Sony HX200V being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before going right into a full comparison, here is a concise summary of how the GR Digital IV matches up vs the HX200V in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

        

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Sony HX200V

 GR Digital IV HX200V 
Display resolution1230k922kSharper display (+308k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony HX200V over the Ricoh GR Digital IV

 HX200V GR Digital IV 
AnnouncedMay 2012September 2011Fresher by 7 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display

Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sony HX200V

 GR Digital IV HX200V 
Manual focus Very precise focusing
Display size3"3"Same display measurements
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither provides Touch friendly display

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony HX200V Physical Comparison

If you're going to carry your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GR Digital IV provides exterior dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Sony HX200V has measurements of 122mm x 87mm x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") accompanied by a weight of 583 grams (1.29 lbs).

Take a look at the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sony HX200V in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is a front view size comparison of the GR Digital IV compared to the HX200V.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony HX200V size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GR Digital IV and HX200V is 92 and 66 respectively.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony HX200V top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony HX200V Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is hard to see the contrast in sensor sizing just by going through a spec sheet. The graphic here may give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the GR Digital IV and HX200V.

Clearly, the two cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The GR Digital IV due to its larger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Sony HX200V will show greater detail due to its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The older GR Digital IV will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony HX200V sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony HX200V Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony HX200V Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Portrait photography information
Sony HX200V Portrait photography information
40
manual focus
supports RAW formats
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/1.7")
44
focusing manually
sensor resolution is decent (18 megapixels)
offers face detect autofocus
can't use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV as a Street photography camera
Sony HX200V as a Street photography camera
64
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW formats
no articulating screen
very small sensor (1/1.7")
51
has a tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
heavier than average (583g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV as a Sports photography camera
Sony HX200V as a Sports photography camera
33
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
better than average battery pack (390 shots)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
very small sensor (1/1.7")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
56
incredible zoom range (27-810mm 30.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (18 megapixels)
offers tracking focus
great battery life (450 CIPA)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Travel photography info
Sony HX200V Travel photography info
67
better than average battery pack (390 per charge)
flash built-in
great maximum aperture (f1.9)
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
does not have a selfie friendly display
56
great battery life (450 CIPA)
sensor resolution is decent (18 megapixels)
has built in flash
rather wide (27mm)
long reach (810mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
heavier than average (583g)
does not have selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Landscape photography factors
Sony HX200V Landscape photography factors
52
manual focus
great maximum aperture (f1.9)
nice screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW formats
better than average battery pack (390 per charge)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
very small sensor (1/1.7")
50
focusing manually
rather wide (27mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (18 megapixels)
great battery life (450 per charge)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV as a Vlogging camera
Sony HX200V as a Vlogging camera
29
great maximum aperture (f1.9)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
does not have a selfie friendly display
video resolution low (640 x 480 resolution)
missing microphone support
27
rather wide (27mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detect autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
does not have selfie friendly screen
doesn't have mic port
heavier than average (583 grams)
Photography Glossary

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony HX200V Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sony HX200V
 Ricoh GR Digital IVSony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V
General Information
Make Ricoh Sony
Model type Ricoh GR Digital IV Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2011-09-15 2012-05-11
Body design Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor - BIONZ
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 7.44 x 5.58mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 41.5mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 18 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 4896 x 3672
Highest native ISO 3200 12800
Min native ISO 80 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28mm (1x) 27-810mm (30.0x)
Largest aperture f/1.9 f/2.8-5.6
Macro focusing distance 1cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 4.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Tilting
Screen sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 1,230k dot 922k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen technology - XtraFine TruBlack TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (optional) Electronic
Features
Minimum shutter speed 1 seconds 30 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed - 10.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.00 m 12.40 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Slow Sync
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 190 gr (0.42 lb) 583 gr (1.29 lb)
Physical dimensions 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") 122 x 87 x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 390 photos 450 photos
Battery form Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID DB65 NP-FH50
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots 1 1
Launch cost $599 $480