Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony HX300
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
63 Imaging
44 Features
51 Overall
46
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony HX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Revealed September 2011
- Replaced the Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 623g - 130 x 103 x 93mm
- Released February 2013
- Replaced the Sony HX200V
- Newer Model is Sony HX400V
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony HX300 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Ricoh GR Digital IV versus Sony HX300, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Ricoh and Sony. There exists a significant gap between the resolutions of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and HX300 (20MP) and the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and HX300 (1/2.3") boast different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe GR Digital IV was manufactured 17 months earlier than the HX300 which makes them a generation away from one another. Both cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera and the Sony HX300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting into a full comparison, here is a short overview of how the GR Digital IV grades vs the HX300 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony HX300 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery and Sony HX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Sony HX300
GR Digital IV | HX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1230k | 921k | Clearer screen (+309k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony HX300 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
HX300 | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2013 | September 2011 | More modern by 17 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sony HX300
GR Digital IV | HX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony HX300 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to take into account its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GR Digital IV provides outside measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Sony HX300 has measurements of 130mm x 103mm x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") with a weight of 623 grams (1.37 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh GR Digital IV versus Sony HX300 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you use at that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the GR Digital IV and the HX300.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GR Digital IV and HX300 is 92 and 63 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony HX300 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizes only by reviewing a spec sheet. The image below should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the GR Digital IV and HX300.
As you can see, the two cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The GR Digital IV featuring a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Sony HX300 will deliver extra detail due to its extra 10MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots more aggressively. The more aged GR Digital IV is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony HX300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony HX300 Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital IV | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh GR Digital IV | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2011-09-15 | 2013-02-20 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5184 x 3888 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
Max aperture | f/1.9 | f/2.8-6.3 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,230k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | Electronic |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 190g (0.42 lbs) | 623g (1.37 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 130 x 103 x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 images | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | DB65 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | - |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $599 | $339 |