Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony HX350
92 Imaging
34 Features
47 Overall
39
62 Imaging
46 Features
51 Overall
48
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony HX350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Released September 2011
- Earlier Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200 (Boost to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 652g - 130 x 93 x 103mm
- Launched December 2016
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony HX350 Overview
Lets look much closer at the Ricoh GR Digital IV versus Sony HX350, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Ricoh and Sony. There exists a sizeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and HX350 (20MP) and the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and HX350 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe GR Digital IV was manufactured 6 years earlier than the HX350 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera and the Sony HX350 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting through a in-depth comparison, below is a short highlight of how the GR Digital IV matches up against the HX350 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony HX350 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery and Sony HX350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Sony HX350
| GR Digital IV | HX350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 1230k | 922k | Crisper screen (+308k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony HX350 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
| HX350 | GR Digital IV | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | December 2016 | September 2011 | Fresher by 64 months | |
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sony HX350
| GR Digital IV | HX350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
| Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen sizing | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither includes Touch screen |
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony HX350 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera frequently, you will want to take into account its weight and size. The Ricoh GR Digital IV features external measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Sony HX350 has specifications of 130mm x 93mm x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") and a weight of 652 grams (1.44 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh GR Digital IV versus Sony HX350 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you use during that time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the GR Digital IV against the HX350.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GR Digital IV and HX350 is 92 and 62 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony HX350 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to see the contrast in sensor sizing only by seeing technical specs. The visual here should offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the GR Digital IV and HX350.
As you can tell, both the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The GR Digital IV featuring a bigger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Sony HX350 will provide greater detail due to its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots much more aggressively. The older GR Digital IV will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony HX350 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony HX350 Specifications
| Ricoh GR Digital IV | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model type | Ricoh GR Digital IV | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2011-09-15 | 2016-12-20 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | BIONZ X |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 20MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5184 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/1.9 | f/2.8-6.3 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 1,230k dots | 922k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 202k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1 secs | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 8.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Off, auto, fill, slow sync, advanced, rear sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 190g (0.42 lb) | 652g (1.44 lb) |
| Dimensions | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 130 x 93 x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 390 pictures | 300 pictures |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | DB65 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC + Memory Stick Pro Duo |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $599 | - |