Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony HX400V
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
62 Imaging
45 Features
60 Overall
51
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony HX400V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Introduced September 2011
- Earlier Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 660g - 130 x 93 x 103mm
- Released February 2014
- Earlier Model is Sony HX300
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony HX400V Overview
Here, we will be evaluating the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sony HX400V, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Ricoh and Sony. There exists a sizeable gap among the resolutions of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and HX400V (20MP) and the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and HX400V (1/2.3") provide different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe GR Digital IV was brought out 3 years earlier than the HX400V and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera and the Sony HX400V being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief summation of how the GR Digital IV matches up against the HX400V in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony HX400V Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery and Sony HX400V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Sony HX400V
GR Digital IV | HX400V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1230k | 921k | Sharper screen (+309k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony HX400V over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
HX400V | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2014 | September 2011 | More recent by 29 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sony HX400V
GR Digital IV | HX400V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony HX400V Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera often, you'll need to think about its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GR Digital IV features outer dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Sony HX400V has proportions of 130mm x 93mm x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") along with a weight of 660 grams (1.46 lbs).
See the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sony HX400V in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have at that time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the GR Digital IV versus the HX400V.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GR Digital IV and HX400V is 92 and 62 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony HX400V Sensor Comparison
Normally, its difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements just by viewing a spec sheet. The visual underneath may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR Digital IV and HX400V.
Clearly, both of these cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The GR Digital IV because of its bigger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh easier and the Sony HX400V will provide you with greater detail having its extra 10MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The older GR Digital IV will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony HX400V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony HX400V Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital IV | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh GR Digital IV | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2011-09-15 | 2014-02-12 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5184 x 3888 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/1.9 | f/2.8-6.3 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,230k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 8.50 m (ISO Auto) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Flash Off / Autoflash / Fill-flash / Slow Sync. / Advanced Flash / Rear Sync. / Wireless (with optional compliant flash) |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p), 1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 190g (0.42 lb) | 660g (1.46 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 130 x 93 x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 photos | 300 photos |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | DB65 | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $599 | $448 |