Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony RX10
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/66cf9/66cf9a75906dc0e9f2d3d249d34bb9f3f9d5798c" alt="Ricoh GR Digital IV front Ricoh GR Digital IV front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ef3ef/ef3ef6db878f09ebdcfc7b9bfb9837bae64cabe2" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 front"
58 Imaging
51 Features
76 Overall
61
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony RX10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Introduced September 2011
- Succeeded the Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-200mm (F2.8) lens
- 813g - 129 x 88 x 102mm
- Released March 2014
- Later Model is Sony RX10 II
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony RX10 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Ricoh GR Digital IV versus Sony RX10, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by competitors Ricoh and Sony. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and RX10 (20MP) and the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and RX10 (1") possess different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The GR Digital IV was manufactured 3 years prior to the RX10 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera and the Sony RX10 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the GR Digital IV grades vs the RX10 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony RX10 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GR Digital IV & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery & Sony RX10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Sony RX10
GR Digital IV | RX10 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX10 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
RX10 | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | March 2014 | ![]() | September 2011 | More modern by 30 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1290k | ![]() | 1230k | Sharper screen (+60k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sony RX10
GR Digital IV | RX10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony RX10 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to consider its weight and volume. The Ricoh GR Digital IV provides exterior measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Sony RX10 has sizing of 129mm x 88mm x 102mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 4.0") along with a weight of 813 grams (1.79 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh GR Digital IV versus Sony RX10 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with at the time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the GR Digital IV compared to the RX10.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/055d6/055d60c0560013fb92ecd37d717c991f3bf39c97" alt="Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony RX10 size comparison Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony RX10 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the GR Digital IV and RX10 is 92 and 58 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a03e8/a03e8f0cfdd4c1a8e63aee805204d45169ce46b6" alt="Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony RX10 top view buttons comparison Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony RX10 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony RX10 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very hard to imagine the difference in sensor sizes only by seeing specs. The pic underneath might give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the GR Digital IV and RX10.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The GR Digital IV because of its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field more difficult and the Sony RX10 will produce greater detail due to its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more aged GR Digital IV will be behind in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/587ab/587abeecd81f9c3093b59279e93f15c59ca028cc" alt="Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony RX10 sensor size comparison Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony RX10 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony RX10 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55676/556763fd1293c771fbf45abe92381cb888f2ee3e" alt="Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony RX10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony RX10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony RX10 Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital IV | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh GR Digital IV | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2011-09-15 | 2014-03-20 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 24-200mm (8.3x) |
Maximal aperture | f/1.9 | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,230k dot | 1,290k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | - | WhiteMagic |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/3200 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 10.20 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 190 grams (0.42 lb) | 813 grams (1.79 lb) |
Dimensions | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 129 x 88 x 102mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 4.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 69 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.9 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 474 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 photos | 420 photos |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | DB65 | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $599 | $698 |