Clicky

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony RX10 II

Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
47
Overall
39
Ricoh GR Digital IV front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II front
Portability
58
Imaging
52
Features
77
Overall
62

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony RX10 II Key Specs

Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
  • Launched September 2011
  • Old Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
Sony RX10 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 24-200mm (F2.8) lens
  • 813g - 129 x 88 x 102mm
  • Announced June 2015
  • Previous Model is Sony RX10
  • New Model is Sony RX10 III
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony RX10 II Overview

Below, we will be comparing the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sony RX10 II, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by competitors Ricoh and Sony. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and RX10 II (20MP) and the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and RX10 II (1") feature totally different sensor size.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The GR Digital IV was unveiled 4 years earlier than the RX10 II which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera and the Sony RX10 II being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before we go in to a more detailed comparison, below is a short highlight of how the GR Digital IV grades versus the RX10 II in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Sony RX10 II

 GR Digital IV RX10 II 
Screen resolution1230k1229kCrisper screen (+1k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony RX10 II over the Ricoh GR Digital IV

 RX10 II GR Digital IV 
AnnouncedJune 2015September 2011Newer by 45 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen

Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sony RX10 II

 GR Digital IV RX10 II 
Manual focus Very precise focus
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen size
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch screen Absent Touch screen

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony RX10 II Physical Comparison

If you're going to travel with your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and volume. The Ricoh GR Digital IV features exterior dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Sony RX10 II has sizing of 129mm x 88mm x 102mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 4.0") with a weight of 813 grams (1.79 lbs).

Check the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sony RX10 II in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with during that time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the GR Digital IV vs the RX10 II.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony RX10 II size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GR Digital IV and RX10 II is 92 and 58 respectively.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony RX10 II top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony RX10 II Sensor Comparison

Normally, it can be difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by going over technical specs. The pic underneath should offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the GR Digital IV and RX10 II.

As you have seen, each of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The GR Digital IV using its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower DOF harder and the Sony RX10 II will deliver greater detail having an extra 10MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more aged GR Digital IV is going to be behind in sensor technology.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony RX10 II sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony RX10 II Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony RX10 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Portrait photography features
Sony RX10 II Portrait photography features
41
you can focus manually
delivers RAW formats
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/1.7")
71
manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
sensor size is good (1")
has face detection autofocus
supports RAW files
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV as a Street photography camera
Sony RX10 II as a Street photography camera
65
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor (1/1.7")
72
has a tilting screen
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor size is good (1")
supports RAW files
weather proofing
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Sports photography details
Sony RX10 II Sports photography details
34
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
great battery life (390 shots)
fixed focal length (28mm)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/1.7")
doesn't have phase detect AF
68
silent shutter (1/32,000 seconds)
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (1")
has tracking autofocus
weather proofing
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Travel photography advice
Sony RX10 II Travel photography advice
67
great battery life (390 shots)
flash built-in
great maximum aperture (f1.9)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
56
weather proofing
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
has built in flash
rather wide (24mm)
no Timelapse function
does not have a selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Ricoh GR Digital IV
Landscape photography with Sony RX10 II
53
you can focus manually
great maximum aperture (f1.9)
screen is a decent size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
great battery life (390 shots)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (28mm)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/1.7")
62
manual focus
rather wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
sensor size is good (1")
supports RAW files
weather proofing
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
no Timelapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV Vlogging advice
Sony RX10 II Vlogging advice
29
great maximum aperture (f1.9)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (640 x 480 pixels)
no external mic support
31
rather wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
has face detection autofocus
high quality video (3840 x 2160 pxls)
has external microphone socket
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony RX10 II Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sony RX10 II
 Ricoh GR Digital IVSony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II
General Information
Company Ricoh Sony
Model Ricoh GR Digital IV Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II
Type Small Sensor Compact Large Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2011-09-15 2015-06-10
Physical type Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Powered by - Bionz X
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/1.7" 1"
Sensor measurements 7.44 x 5.58mm 13.2 x 8.8mm
Sensor surface area 41.5mm² 116.2mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 5472 x 3648
Highest native ISO 3200 12800
Highest enhanced ISO - 25600
Min native ISO 80 125
RAW pictures
Min enhanced ISO - 64
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points - 25
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28mm (1x) 24-200mm (8.3x)
Max aperture f/1.9 f/2.8
Macro focus distance 1cm 3cm
Crop factor 4.8 2.7
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Tilting
Screen sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 1,230 thousand dots 1,229 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (optional) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359 thousand dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.7x
Features
Min shutter speed 1 secs 30 secs
Max shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Max silent shutter speed - 1/32000 secs
Continuous shutter rate - 14.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.00 m 10.20 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Highest video resolution 640x480 3840x2160
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 190 gr (0.42 lbs) 813 gr (1.79 lbs)
Dimensions 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") 129 x 88 x 102mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 4.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 70
DXO Color Depth score not tested 23.0
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.6
DXO Low light score not tested 531
Other
Battery life 390 shots 400 shots
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model DB65 NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo
Card slots Single Single
Cost at release $599 $998