Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony RX100 II
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
89 Imaging
51 Features
74 Overall
60
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony RX100 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Launched September 2011
- Old Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 160 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 281g - 102 x 58 x 38mm
- Announced June 2013
- Earlier Model is Sony RX100
- Newer Model is Sony RX100 III
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony RX100 II Overview
In this write-up, we are comparing the Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony RX100 II, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Ricoh and Sony. There exists a sizeable gap between the resolutions of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and RX100 II (20MP) and the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and RX100 II (1") use totally different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe GR Digital IV was unveiled 21 months before the RX100 II making the cameras a generation apart from one another. The two cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera and the Sony RX100 II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before delving in to a thorough comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the GR Digital IV grades against the RX100 II in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony RX100 II Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II. The full galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery and Sony RX100 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Sony RX100 II
GR Digital IV | RX100 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1230k | 1229k | Sharper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony RX100 II over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
RX100 II | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | June 2013 | September 2011 | More recent by 21 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sony RX100 II
GR Digital IV | RX100 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony RX100 II Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera, you have to consider its weight and volume. The Ricoh GR Digital IV has got outer dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Sony RX100 II has sizing of 102mm x 58mm x 38mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.5") along with a weight of 281 grams (0.62 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony RX100 II in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the GR Digital IV compared to the RX100 II.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GR Digital IV and RX100 II is 92 and 89 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony RX100 II Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to envision the difference between sensor measurements only by checking specs. The visual below will give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR Digital IV and RX100 II.
All in all, both the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The GR Digital IV having a tinier sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field more challenging and the Sony RX100 II will resolve more detail having an extra 10MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The older GR Digital IV is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony RX100 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony RX100 II Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital IV | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh GR Digital IV | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2011-09-15 | 2013-06-27 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 160 |
RAW files | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 28-100mm (3.6x) |
Largest aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8-4.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,230k dot | 1,229k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | - | Xtra Fine WhiteMagic TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 15.00 m (ISO Auto (W)) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/2000s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 190g (0.42 lb) | 281g (0.62 lb) |
Dimensions | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 102 x 58 x 38mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 67 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.5 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.4 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 483 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 images | 350 images |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | DB65 | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10 sec. / 2 sec. / Self-portrait One-person/ Self-portrait Two-person/ Self timer Continuous (3 or 5 shots)) |
Time lapse recording | With downloadable app | |
Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail price | $599 | $598 |