Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony RX100 III
92 Imaging
34 Features
47 Overall
39


89 Imaging
51 Features
77 Overall
61
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony RX100 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Introduced September 2011
- Previous Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-70mm (F1.8-2.8) lens
- 290g - 102 x 58 x 41mm
- Introduced May 2014
- Succeeded the Sony RX100 II
- Refreshed by Sony RX100 IV

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony RX100 III Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Ricoh GR Digital IV versus Sony RX100 III, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Ricoh and Sony. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and RX100 III (20MP) and the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and RX100 III (1") provide totally different sensor sizes.

The GR Digital IV was brought out 3 years before the RX100 III which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera and the Sony RX100 III being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go right into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief summary of how the GR Digital IV scores vs the RX100 III in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony RX100 III Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery and Sony RX100 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Sony RX100 III
GR Digital IV | RX100 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 1229k | Sharper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony RX100 III over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
RX100 III | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | May 2014 | ![]() | September 2011 | More modern by 32 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sony RX100 III
GR Digital IV | RX100 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony RX100 III Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GR Digital IV provides outer measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Sony RX100 III has proportions of 102mm x 58mm x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 290 grams (0.64 lbs).
Examine the Ricoh GR Digital IV versus Sony RX100 III in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you use at that time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the GR Digital IV and the RX100 III.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GR Digital IV and RX100 III is 92 and 89 respectively.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony RX100 III Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is hard to see the contrast between sensor sizes only by looking at a spec sheet. The picture underneath might provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the GR Digital IV and RX100 III.
Clearly, both of the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The GR Digital IV featuring a tinier sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field harder and the Sony RX100 III will resolve greater detail having its extra 10MP. Greater resolution will help you crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged GR Digital IV is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony RX100 III Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony RX100 III Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital IV | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh GR Digital IV | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2011-09-15 | 2014-05-15 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 24-70mm (2.9x) |
Maximum aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8-2.8 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,230k dots | 1,229k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.59x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/2000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p/60i/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p/120p), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 190 grams (0.42 lbs) | 290 grams (0.64 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 102 x 58 x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 67 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 495 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 photographs | 320 photographs |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | DB65 | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, self-portrait, continuous) |
Time lapse recording | With downloadable app | |
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $599 | $748 |