Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony T900
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Announced September 2011
- Succeeded the Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Revealed February 2009
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony T900 Overview
Below is a detailed review of the Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony T900, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Ultracompact by brands Ricoh and Sony. The resolution of the GR Digital IV (10MP) and the T900 (12MP) is fairly well matched but the GR Digital IV (1/1.7") and T900 (1/2.3") posses different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe GR Digital IV was released 2 years later than the T900 and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going right into a full comparison, here is a short view of how the GR Digital IV scores vs the T900 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony T900 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery and Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Sony T900
GR Digital IV | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2011 | February 2009 | More recent by 32 months | |
Display resolution | 1230k | 922k | Crisper display (+308k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
T900 | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3.5" | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GR Digital IV and Sony T900
GR Digital IV | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial exact focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and volume. The Ricoh GR Digital IV offers exterior dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Sony T900 has sizing of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") along with a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony T900 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you use at that moment. Here is a front view size comparison of the GR Digital IV versus the T900.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GR Digital IV and T900 is 92 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to picture the gap between sensor measurements purely by reading through technical specs. The graphic underneath will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR Digital IV and T900.
As you have seen, both of the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The GR Digital IV featuring a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Sony T900 will give you more detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The newer GR Digital IV provides a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Sony T900 Specifications
Ricoh GR Digital IV | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh GR Digital IV | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2011-09-15 | 2009-02-17 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/1.9 | f/3.5-10.0 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3.5" |
Screen resolution | 1,230k dot | 922k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1s | 2s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1000s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 190g (0.42 pounds) | 143g (0.32 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 390 photos | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | DB65 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $599 | $300 |