Ricoh GR II vs Ricoh GR III
89 Imaging
59 Features
55 Overall
57
90 Imaging
69 Features
62 Overall
66
Ricoh GR II vs Ricoh GR III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
- 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
- Announced June 2015
- Older Model is Ricoh GR
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Released September 2018
- Replaced the Ricoh GR III
- Replacement is Ricoh GR III
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh GR II vs Ricoh GR III Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Ricoh GR II vs Ricoh GR III, both Large Sensor Compact digital cameras and both are designed by Ricoh. There is a significant difference between the image resolutions of the GR II (16MP) and GR III (24MP) but they use the same exact sensor sizing (APS-C).
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe GR II was introduced 4 years earlier than the GR III which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Large Sensor Compact).
Before delving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick summary of how the GR II grades vs the GR III with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Ricoh GR II vs Ricoh GR III Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GR II and Ricoh GR III. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh GR II Gallery and Ricoh GR III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Ricoh GR III
| GR II | GR III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 1230k |  | 1037k | Clearer screen (+193k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Ricoh GR II
| GR III | GR II | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2018 |  | June 2015 | More modern by 39 months |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GR II and Ricoh GR III
| GR II | GR III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Ricoh GR II vs Ricoh GR III Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to factor in its weight and size. The Ricoh GR II offers outer measurements of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") along with a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR III has specifications of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh GR II vs Ricoh GR III in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you choose during that time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the GR II versus the GR III.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the GR II and GR III is 89 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh GR II vs Ricoh GR III Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes just by going over specs. The image here may give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the GR II and GR III.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Ricoh GR III to offer more detail using its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots far more aggressively. The more aged GR II is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Ricoh GR II vs Ricoh GR III Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Ricoh GR II vs Ricoh GR III Specifications
| Ricoh GR II | Ricoh GR III | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Ricoh | Ricoh |
| Model type | Ricoh GR II | Ricoh GR III |
| Category | Large Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2015-06-17 | 2018-09-25 |
| Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | GR Engine V | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor area | 372.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 102400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 28mm (1x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-16.0 | f/2.8-16 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 6cm |
| Crop factor | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 1,230k dot | 1,037k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 300s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 251 gr (0.55 lb) | 257 gr (0.57 lb) |
| Dimensions | 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 80 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 23.6 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.7 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 1078 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 320 shots | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | DB-65 | - |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $599 | $900 |