Ricoh GR II vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
89 Imaging
59 Features
55 Overall
57
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
Ricoh GR II vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
- 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
- Announced June 2015
- Earlier Model is Ricoh GR
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Released November 2009
Ricoh GR II vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
Its time to examine more in depth at the Ricoh GR II versus Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless and both of them are designed by Ricoh. There is a sizable difference among the resolutions of the GR II (16MP) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) but they come with the exact same sensor dimensions (APS-C).
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe GR II was brought out 5 years later than the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going in to a detailed comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the GR II matches up against the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh GR II vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GR II & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh GR II Gallery & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
GR II | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | June 2015 | November 2009 | More recent by 69 months | |
Screen resolution | 1230k | 920k | Sharper screen (+310k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Ricoh GR II
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | GR II |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR II and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
GR II | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh GR II vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GR II enjoys outer dimensions of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") along with a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") and a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh GR II versus Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing at the time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the GR II against the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the GR II and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 89 and 77 respectively.
Ricoh GR II vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to envision the difference in sensor measurements simply by going through specs. The photograph here may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR II and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Ricoh GR II to produce extra detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more modern GR II will have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Ricoh GR II vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR II vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
Ricoh GR II | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Ricoh |
Model type | Ricoh GR II | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
Class | Large Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Announced | 2015-06-17 | 2009-11-10 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | GR Engine V | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 372.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 4288 x 2848 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 50mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-16.0 | f/2.5 |
Macro focusing range | 10cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 300 secs | 180 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/3200 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 251g (0.55 lb) | 453g (1.00 lb) |
Dimensions | 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1078 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 images | 320 images |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | DB-65 | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $599 | $566 |