Ricoh GR II vs Ricoh WG-30W
89 Imaging
59 Features
55 Overall
57
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Ricoh GR II vs Ricoh WG-30W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
- 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
- Launched June 2015
- Succeeded the Ricoh GR
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 194g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched October 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Ricoh GR II vs Ricoh WG-30W Overview
Below, we are looking at the Ricoh GR II versus Ricoh WG-30W, one is a Large Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof and both of them are built by Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the GR II (16MP) and the WG-30W (16MP) is fairly comparable but the GR II (APS-C) and WG-30W (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe GR II was introduced 9 months after the WG-30W and they are of a similar generation. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Ricoh WG-30W being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a thorough comparison, below is a quick overview of how the GR II grades vs the WG-30W when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh GR II vs Ricoh WG-30W Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GR II and Ricoh WG-30W. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR II Gallery and Ricoh WG-30W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Ricoh WG-30W
| GR II | WG-30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | June 2015 |  | October 2014 | More modern by 9 months |
| Focus manually |  | More precise focus | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 1230k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+1000k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30W over the Ricoh GR II
| WG-30W | GR II |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR II and Ricoh WG-30W
| GR II | WG-30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Ricoh GR II vs Ricoh WG-30W Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR II has outer measurements of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") along with a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-30W has dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh GR II versus Ricoh WG-30W in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the GR II against the WG-30W.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GR II and WG-30W is 89 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh GR II vs Ricoh WG-30W Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to envision the gap in sensor sizes only by going through specs. The image underneath will provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the GR II and WG-30W.
All in all, both of these cameras posses the exact same megapixels but not the same sensor sizes. The GR II has got the larger sensor which should make getting shallower depth of field simpler. The more modern GR II is going to have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh GR II vs Ricoh WG-30W Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Ricoh GR II vs Ricoh WG-30W Specifications
| Ricoh GR II | Ricoh WG-30W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Ricoh | Ricoh |
| Model type | Ricoh GR II | Ricoh WG-30W |
| Class | Large Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2015-06-17 | 2014-10-09 |
| Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | GR Engine V | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 372.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-16.0 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 1,230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 300s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 251g (0.55 lb) | 194g (0.43 lb) |
| Dimensions | 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 80 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 23.6 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.7 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 1078 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 320 shots | 300 shots |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | DB-65 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $599 | $280 |