Ricoh GR II vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
89 Imaging
59 Features
55 Overall
57
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Ricoh GR II vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
- 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
- Introduced June 2015
- Succeeded the Ricoh GR
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2014
- Replacement is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Ricoh GR II vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
Lets look more closely at the Ricoh GR II versus Ricoh WG-4 GPS, former is a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof and both are sold by Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the GR II (16MP) and the WG-4 GPS (16MP) is very well matched but the GR II (APS-C) and WG-4 GPS (1/2.3") have totally different sensor size.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe GR II was launched 17 months after the WG-4 GPS making them a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera.
Before going straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a simple summation of how the GR II scores vs the WG-4 GPS for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh GR II vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GR II & Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh GR II Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
GR II | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | June 2015 | February 2014 | More modern by 17 months | |
Display resolution | 1230k | 460k | Crisper display (+770k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Ricoh GR II
WG-4 GPS | GR II |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR II and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
GR II | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display size | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Ricoh GR II vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera, you will need to factor its weight and size. The Ricoh GR II has physical measurements of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") having a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has specifications of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh GR II versus Ricoh WG-4 GPS in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the GR II and the WG-4 GPS.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the GR II and WG-4 GPS is 89 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh GR II vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very hard to visualise the gap between sensor sizes purely by reading through specs. The picture here should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the GR II and WG-4 GPS.
All in all, each of these cameras feature the identical MP but not the same sensor sizes. The GR II contains the larger sensor which will make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult. The younger GR II is going to have a benefit in sensor technology.
Ricoh GR II vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR II vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
Ricoh GR II | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Ricoh |
Model type | Ricoh GR II | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
Category | Large Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2015-06-17 | 2014-02-05 |
Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | GR Engine V | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 372.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-16.0 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | 10cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 300 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 251g (0.55 pounds) | 235g (0.52 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1078 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 images | 240 images |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | DB-65 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $599 | $210 |