Ricoh GR II vs Ricoh WG-M1
89 Imaging
59 Features
55 Overall
57
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
Ricoh GR II vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
- 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
- Announced June 2015
- Replaced the Ricoh GR
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Revealed September 2014
Ricoh GR II vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
In this article, we are reviewing the Ricoh GR II vs Ricoh WG-M1, one being a Large Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof and both are produced by Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the GR II (16MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is fairly comparable but the GR II (APS-C) and WG-M1 (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe GR II was launched 10 months later than the WG-M1 so they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a concise overview of how the GR II grades against the WG-M1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh GR II vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GR II and Ricoh WG-M1. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR II Gallery and Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Ricoh WG-M1
GR II | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | June 2015 | September 2014 | Fresher by 10 months | |
Manually focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.5") | |
Display resolution | 1230k | 115k | Clearer display (+1115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Ricoh GR II
WG-M1 | GR II |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR II and Ricoh WG-M1
GR II | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Ricoh GR II vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera frequently, you need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR II comes with external dimensions of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") along with a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-M1 has dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh GR II vs Ricoh WG-M1 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you select during that time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the GR II versus the WG-M1.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the GR II and WG-M1 is 89 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh GR II vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to visualize the gap in sensor sizing simply by going through a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the GR II and WG-M1.
Clearly, the 2 cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The GR II because of its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Ricoh GR II will provide more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop images far more aggressively. The more recent GR II provides a benefit in sensor technology.
Ricoh GR II vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR II vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
Ricoh GR II | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Ricoh |
Model | Ricoh GR II | Ricoh WG-M1 |
Type | Large Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Announced | 2015-06-17 | 2014-09-12 |
Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | GR Engine V | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 372.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 800 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | (1×) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-16.0 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 1.5 inch |
Display resolution | 1,230 thousand dots | 115 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 300 seconds | - |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 251g (0.55 lbs) | 190g (0.42 lbs) |
Dimensions | 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 13.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1078 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 pictures | 350 pictures |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | DB-65 | DB-65 |
Self timer | Yes | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at release | $599 | $2,000 |