Ricoh GR II vs Samsung CL5
89 Imaging
59 Features
55 Overall
57
95 Imaging
32 Features
14 Overall
24
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung CL5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
- 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
- Announced June 2015
- Replaced the Ricoh GR
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.5-4.5) lens
- 141g - 93 x 60 x 19mm
- Released February 2009
- Alternative Name is PL10
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung CL5 Overview
In this write-up, we are analyzing the Ricoh GR II vs Samsung CL5, former is a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the GR II (16MP) and CL5 (9MP) and the GR II (APS-C) and CL5 (1/2.5") use different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe GR II was unveiled 6 years after the CL5 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung CL5 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise summary of how the GR II scores versus the CL5 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung CL5 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GR II & Samsung CL5. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh GR II Gallery & Samsung CL5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Samsung CL5
GR II | CL5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | June 2015 | February 2009 | Newer by 77 months | |
Manually focus | More precise focus | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1230k | 230k | Clearer display (+1000k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung CL5 over the Ricoh GR II
CL5 | GR II |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR II and Samsung CL5
GR II | CL5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung CL5 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera, you should factor its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GR II provides external measurements of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") and a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs) and the Samsung CL5 has proportions of 93mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 141 grams (0.31 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh GR II vs Samsung CL5 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the GR II compared to the CL5.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the GR II and CL5 is 89 and 95 respectively.
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung CL5 Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by reading specs. The pic below may give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the GR II and CL5.
All in all, both of those cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The GR II having a larger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Ricoh GR II will offer you more detail having an extra 7MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos far more aggressively. The fresher GR II should have an edge in sensor tech.
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung CL5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung CL5 Specifications
Ricoh GR II | Samsung CL5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GR II | Samsung CL5 |
Also Known as | - | PL10 |
Class | Large Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2015-06-17 | 2009-02-23 |
Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | GR Engine V | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.5" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
Sensor surface area | 372.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 9 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 3456 x 2592 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 38-114mm (3.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-16.0 | f/3.5-4.5 |
Macro focusing range | 10cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 6.3 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 300s | 16s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 251g (0.55 lb) | 141g (0.31 lb) |
Dimensions | 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 93 x 60 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1078 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 images | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | DB-65 | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $599 | $391 |