Ricoh GR II vs Samsung EX2F
89 Imaging
59 Features
55 Overall
57
90 Imaging
37 Features
62 Overall
47
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung EX2F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
- 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
- Released June 2015
- Old Model is Ricoh GR
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-80mm (F1.4-2.7) lens
- 294g - 112 x 62 x 29mm
- Released December 2012
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung EX2F Overview
Here, we are looking at the Ricoh GR II versus Samsung EX2F, former is a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the GR II (16MP) and EX2F (12MP) and the GR II (APS-C) and EX2F (1/1.7") posses different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe GR II was announced 2 years after the EX2F which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung EX2F being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the GR II matches up against the EX2F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung EX2F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GR II & Samsung EX2F. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh GR II Gallery & Samsung EX2F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Samsung EX2F
GR II | EX2F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | June 2015 | December 2012 | More modern by 31 months | |
Display resolution | 1230k | 0k | Sharper display (+1230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung EX2F over the Ricoh GR II
EX2F | GR II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Ricoh GR II and Samsung EX2F
GR II | EX2F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focus | |||
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display sizing | |
Touch friendly display | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung EX2F Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry around your camera often, you'll have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR II offers outside dimensions of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") and a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs) and the Samsung EX2F has dimensions of 112mm x 62mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 294 grams (0.65 lbs).
Check the Ricoh GR II versus Samsung EX2F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select at that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the GR II and the EX2F.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the GR II and EX2F is 89 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung EX2F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to visualize the difference in sensor sizes simply by going through specs. The picture here may offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the GR II and EX2F.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The GR II using its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Ricoh GR II will produce more detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The younger GR II provides a benefit in sensor technology.
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung EX2F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung EX2F Specifications
Ricoh GR II | Samsung EX2F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GR II | Samsung EX2F |
Type | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2015-06-17 | 2012-12-18 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | GR Engine V | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 372.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
Highest resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 24-80mm (3.3x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-16.0 | f/1.4-2.7 |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,230 thousand dot | 0 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | - | AMOLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 300 seconds | - |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
Flash options | Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) | 1920 x 1080 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 251g (0.55 lbs) | 294g (0.65 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 112 x 62 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 80 | 48 |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.6 | 20.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 13.7 | 11.5 |
DXO Low light score | 1078 | 209 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photographs | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | DB-65 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $599 | $478 |