Ricoh GR II vs Samsung GX-1S
89 Imaging
59 Features
55 Overall
57
68 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung GX-1S Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
- 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
- Introduced June 2015
- Replaced the Ricoh GR
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 605g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Revealed January 2006
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Ricoh GR II vs Samsung GX-1S Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Ricoh GR II vs Samsung GX-1S, former is a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There is a sizable difference among the resolutions of the GR II (16MP) and GX-1S (6MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor size (APS-C).
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe GR II was manufactured 9 years after the GX-1S which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung GX-1S being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before going in to a complete comparison, below is a short introduction of how the GR II scores against the GX-1S when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh GR II vs Samsung GX-1S Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GR II & Samsung GX-1S. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh GR II Gallery & Samsung GX-1S Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Samsung GX-1S
| GR II | GX-1S | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | June 2015 |  | January 2006 | Newer by 115 months |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 1230k |  | 210k | Crisper display (+1020k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-1S over the Ricoh GR II
| GX-1S | GR II |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR II and Samsung GX-1S
| GR II | GX-1S | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither provides Touch display |
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung GX-1S Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera, you will want to think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR II provides exterior dimensions of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") having a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs) and the Samsung GX-1S has dimensions of 125mm x 93mm x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") having a weight of 605 grams (1.33 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh GR II vs Samsung GX-1S in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the GR II and the GX-1S.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the GR II and GX-1S is 89 and 68 respectively.
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung GX-1S Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to envision the difference in sensor dimensions only by looking through technical specs. The image below should provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR II and GX-1S.
As you have seen, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Ricoh GR II to render extra detail due to its extra 10MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos much more aggressively. The younger GR II is going to have an advantage in sensor technology.
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung GX-1S Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung GX-1S Specifications
| Ricoh GR II | Samsung GX-1S | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh GR II | Samsung GX-1S |
| Type | Large Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
| Introduced | 2015-06-17 | 2006-01-16 |
| Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | GR Engine V | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 372.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 6 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 3008 x 2008 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Pentax KAF |
| Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-16.0 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | - |
| Available lenses | - | 151 |
| Crop factor | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Resolution of display | 1,230k dots | 210k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 300 secs | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 251 grams (0.55 pounds) | 605 grams (1.33 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 80 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 23.6 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.7 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 1078 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 320 pictures | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | DB-65 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC card |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $599 | $850 |