Ricoh GR II vs Samsung MV800
89 Imaging
59 Features
55 Overall
57
97 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung MV800 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
- 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
- Released June 2015
- Superseded the Ricoh GR
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 121g - 92 x 56 x 10mm
- Launched September 2011
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh GR II vs Samsung MV800 Overview
In this write-up, we will be contrasting the Ricoh GR II and Samsung MV800, former is a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the GR II (16MP) and the MV800 (16MP) is relatively similar but the GR II (APS-C) and MV800 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe GR II was launched 3 years after the MV800 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung MV800 being a Compact camera.
Before we go through a thorough comparison, below is a short introduction of how the GR II grades versus the MV800 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh GR II vs Samsung MV800 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GR II & Samsung MV800. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh GR II Gallery & Samsung MV800 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Samsung MV800
| GR II | MV800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | June 2015 |  | September 2011 | More modern by 47 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 1230k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+770k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung MV800 over the Ricoh GR II
| MV800 | GR II | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GR II and Samsung MV800
| GR II | MV800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen |
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung MV800 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR II provides outside measurements of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") along with a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs) and the Samsung MV800 has dimensions of 92mm x 56mm x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") having a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh GR II and Samsung MV800 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select during that time. The following is the front view size comparison of the GR II vs the MV800.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the GR II and MV800 is 89 and 97 respectively.
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung MV800 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to envision the gap between sensor sizes only by reviewing specs. The image below will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the GR II and MV800.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras offer the same exact resolution albeit not the same sensor sizes. The GR II uses the bigger sensor which is going to make getting shallower DOF less difficult. The younger GR II is going to have an edge in sensor technology.
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung MV800 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung MV800 Specifications
| Ricoh GR II | Samsung MV800 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh GR II | Samsung MV800 |
| Category | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2015-06-17 | 2011-09-01 |
| Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | GR Engine V | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 372.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-16.0 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 1,230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 300 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.20 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) | 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320 x 240 (30/15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 251g (0.55 lbs) | 121g (0.27 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 92 x 56 x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 80 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 23.6 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.7 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 1078 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 320 shots | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | DB-65 | BP70 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Micro SD |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $599 | $499 |
