Clicky

Ricoh GR II vs Samsung PL200

Portability
89
Imaging
59
Features
55
Overall
57
Ricoh GR II front
 
Samsung PL200 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
22
Overall
31

Ricoh GR II vs Samsung PL200 Key Specs

Ricoh GR II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
  • 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
  • Introduced June 2015
  • Previous Model is Ricoh GR
Samsung PL200
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
  • 170g - 100 x 60 x 21mm
  • Revealed July 2010
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Ricoh GR II vs Samsung PL200 Overview

In this write-up, we will be looking at the Ricoh GR II versus Samsung PL200, former is a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the GR II (16MP) and the PL200 (14MP) is pretty similar but the GR II (APS-C) and PL200 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor sizes.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The GR II was unveiled 4 years after the PL200 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung PL200 being a Compact camera.

Before we go through a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief summation of how the GR II scores versus the PL200 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Samsung PL200

 GR II PL200 
RevealedJune 2015July 2010Newer by 60 months
Focus manually Very accurate focus
Screen resolution1230k230kClearer screen (+1000k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung PL200 over the Ricoh GR II

 PL200 GR II 

Common features in the Ricoh GR II and Samsung PL200

 GR II PL200 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen dimensions
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither contains Touch friendly screen

Ricoh GR II vs Samsung PL200 Physical Comparison

In case you're planning to travel with your camera often, you will have to factor its weight and volume. The Ricoh GR II has got exterior measurements of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") with a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs) whilst the Samsung PL200 has sizing of 100mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs).

Examine the Ricoh GR II versus Samsung PL200 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using at the time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the GR II against the PL200.

Ricoh GR II vs Samsung PL200 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the GR II and PL200 is 89 and 94 respectively.

Ricoh GR II vs Samsung PL200 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR II vs Samsung PL200 Sensor Comparison

Often, it is hard to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions simply by reviewing specs. The image underneath will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the GR II and PL200.

All in all, each of the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The GR II having a bigger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Ricoh GR II will deliver extra detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures far more aggressively. The more recent GR II will have a benefit in sensor innovation.

Ricoh GR II vs Samsung PL200 sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR II vs Samsung PL200 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR II vs Samsung PL200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Ricoh GR II
Portrait photography with Samsung PL200
75
you can focus manually
good megapixels (16MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
includes face detection focus
exports RAW formats
28
good resolution (14MP)
manual focus not available
manual exposure not possible
cannot use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Ricoh GR II Street photography advice
Samsung PL200 Street photography advice
74
decent sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
lighter than competition (251 grams)
above average high ISO (25,600)
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
57
image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GR II as a Sports photography camera
Samsung PL200 as a Sports photography camera
50
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
includes tracking autofocus
fixed focal length (28mm)
slow continuous shooting (4.0 fps)
no image stabilization
has no phase detect auto focus
38
image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (14 megapixels)
lack of shutter priority mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Ricoh GR II
Travel photography with Samsung PL200
67
lighter than competition (251g)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
missing Timelapse mode
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
58
good resolution (14MP)
flash built-in
lack of Timelapse mode
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (31mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GR II as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung PL200 as a Landscape photography camera
59
you can focus manually
screen size is good (3 inches)
good megapixels (16MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
above average high ISO (25,600)
exports RAW formats
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (28mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
no image stabilization
missing Timelapse mode
37
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (14MP)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (31mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
manual exposure not possible
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
lack of Timelapse mode
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR II Vlogging factors
Samsung PL200 Vlogging factors
32
includes face detection focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition (251g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
missing external microphone socket
25
image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not great (31mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
display isn't selfie friendly
low quality video (640 x 480 pxls)
lack of external microphone support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Ricoh GR II vs Samsung PL200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR II and Samsung PL200
 Ricoh GR IISamsung PL200
General Information
Brand Name Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh GR II Samsung PL200
Category Large Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2015-06-17 2010-07-21
Physical type Large Sensor Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by GR Engine V -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 23.7 x 15.7mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 372.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4928 x 3264 4320 x 3240
Maximum native ISO 25600 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 9 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28mm (1x) 31-217mm (7.0x)
Highest aperture f/2.8-16.0 f/3.3-5.5
Macro focus distance 10cm 5cm
Crop factor 1.5 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 1,230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (optional) None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 300 seconds 8 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/1500 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 4.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) 4.60 m
Flash modes Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 251g (0.55 lb) 170g (0.37 lb)
Dimensions 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") 100 x 60 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.6 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 13.7 not tested
DXO Low light score 1078 not tested
Other
Battery life 320 shots -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model DB-65 BP70A
Self timer Yes Yes
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC'/MMC, Internal
Card slots One One
Price at launch $599 $0