Ricoh GR II vs Samsung SH100
89 Imaging
59 Features
55 Overall
57
99 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung SH100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
- 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
- Released June 2015
- Succeeded the Ricoh GR
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 93 x 54 x 19mm
- Launched January 2011
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh GR II vs Samsung SH100 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Ricoh GR II vs Samsung SH100, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the GR II (16MP) and the SH100 (14MP) is pretty comparable but the GR II (APS-C) and SH100 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor size.
Photography GlossaryThe GR II was revealed 4 years later than the SH100 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung SH100 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going into a complete comparison, here is a short overview of how the GR II scores vs the SH100 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh GR II vs Samsung SH100 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GR II & Samsung SH100. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh GR II Gallery & Samsung SH100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Samsung SH100
| GR II | SH100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | June 2015 |  | January 2011 | Fresher by 55 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 1230k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+1000k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SH100 over the Ricoh GR II
| SH100 | GR II | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GR II and Samsung SH100
| GR II | SH100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung SH100 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera, you'll need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR II features exterior measurements of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs) whilst the Samsung SH100 has dimensions of 93mm x 54mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh GR II vs Samsung SH100 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use at that moment. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the GR II compared to the SH100.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the GR II and SH100 is 89 and 99 respectively.
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung SH100 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to envision the contrast in sensor sizing just by seeing a spec sheet. The visual here may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the GR II and SH100.
As you can see, both of the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The GR II with its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF easier and the Ricoh GR II will show greater detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop shots more aggressively. The fresher GR II is going to have a benefit in sensor tech.
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung SH100 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung SH100 Specifications
| Ricoh GR II | Samsung SH100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh GR II | Samsung SH100 |
| Class | Large Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2015-06-17 | 2011-01-04 |
| Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | GR Engine V | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 372.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 4230 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | - |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | () |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-16.0 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | - |
| Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 1,230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 300 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 4.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 251 gr (0.55 lbs) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 93 x 54 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 80 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 23.6 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 13.7 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 1078 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 320 images | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | DB-65 | - |
| Self timer | Yes | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $599 | $200 |