Ricoh GR II vs Samsung SL102
89 Imaging
59 Features
55 Overall
57
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
- 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
- Revealed June 2015
- Superseded the Ricoh GR
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
- Also Known as ES55
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Lets look more in depth at the Ricoh GR II vs Samsung SL102, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the GR II (16MP) and SL102 (10MP) and the GR II (APS-C) and SL102 (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe GR II was introduced 6 years later than the SL102 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the GR II grades against the SL102 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GR II & Samsung SL102. The whole galleries are available at Ricoh GR II Gallery & Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Samsung SL102
GR II | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | June 2015 | January 2009 | More recent by 79 months | |
Manually focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Screen size | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 1230k | 230k | Sharper screen (+1000k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Ricoh GR II
SL102 | GR II |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR II and Samsung SL102
GR II | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and size. The Ricoh GR II has external measurements of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") having a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL102 has specifications of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh GR II vs Samsung SL102 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use at that time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the GR II and the SL102.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GR II and SL102 is 89 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is hard to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements merely by seeing a spec sheet. The photograph below should give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the GR II and SL102.
As you can see, both of those cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The GR II having a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Ricoh GR II will show extra detail using its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The newer GR II should have an edge in sensor tech.
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
Ricoh GR II | Samsung SL102 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GR II | Samsung SL102 |
Alternative name | - | ES55 |
Type | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2015-06-17 | 2009-01-08 |
Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | GR Engine V | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 372.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-16.0 | - |
Macro focus range | 10cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 2.5" |
Screen resolution | 1,230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 300s | 8s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1500s |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
Flash settings | Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 251g (0.55 pounds) | 116g (0.26 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 13.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1078 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 shots | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | DB-65 | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $599 | $130 |