Clicky

Ricoh GR II vs Samsung SL102

Portability
89
Imaging
59
Features
55
Overall
57
Ricoh GR II front
 
Samsung SL102 front
Portability
96
Imaging
33
Features
21
Overall
28

Ricoh GR II vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs

Ricoh GR II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
  • 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
  • Revealed June 2015
  • Superseded the Ricoh GR
Samsung SL102
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-105mm (F) lens
  • 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
  • Released January 2009
  • Also Known as ES55
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Ricoh GR II vs Samsung SL102 Overview

Lets look more in depth at the Ricoh GR II vs Samsung SL102, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the GR II (16MP) and SL102 (10MP) and the GR II (APS-C) and SL102 (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizing.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The GR II was introduced 6 years later than the SL102 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera.

Before delving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the GR II grades against the SL102 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Samsung SL102

 GR II SL102 
ReleasedJune 2015January 2009More recent by 79 months
Manually focus Very accurate focus
Screen size3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution1230k230kSharper screen (+1000k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Ricoh GR II

 SL102 GR II 

Common features in the Ricoh GR II and Samsung SL102

 GR II SL102 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lack of Touch friendly screen

Ricoh GR II vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison

In case you're planning to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and size. The Ricoh GR II has external measurements of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") having a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL102 has specifications of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).

Check out the Ricoh GR II vs Samsung SL102 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use at that time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the GR II and the SL102.

Ricoh GR II vs Samsung SL102 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GR II and SL102 is 89 and 96 respectively.

Ricoh GR II vs Samsung SL102 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR II vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is hard to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements merely by seeing a spec sheet. The photograph below should give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the GR II and SL102.

As you can see, both of those cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The GR II having a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Ricoh GR II will show extra detail using its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The newer GR II should have an edge in sensor tech.

Ricoh GR II vs Samsung SL102 sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR II vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR II vs Samsung SL102 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Ricoh GR II
Portrait photography with Samsung SL102
75
has manual focus
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
comes with face detection autofocus
saves RAW files
25
comes with face detect autofocus
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not available
can't use external flash
low MP (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Street photography with Ricoh GR II
Street photography with Samsung SL102
74
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW files
lighter than competition in class (251 grams)
above average ISO range (25,600)
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
55
lighter than competition in class (116g)
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Ricoh GR II
Sports photography with Samsung SL102
50
decent megapixels (16MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
comes with tracking autofocus
fixed focal length (28mm)
slow fps (4.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
lacks phase detect autofocus
16
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
low MP (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR II Travel photography features
Samsung SL102 Travel photography features
67
lighter than competition in class (251g)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
no Timelapse mode
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
62
lighter than competition in class (116 grams)
has built in flash
fast max aperture (f)
missing Time Lapse recording
low MP (10MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (35mm)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Ricoh GR II
Landscape photography with Samsung SL102
59
has manual focus
screen size is good (3 inch)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
above average ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (28mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
lack of image stabilization
no Timelapse mode
27
fast max aperture (f)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (35mm)
screen is small (2.5 inches)
manual mode not available
does not have image stabilization
low MP (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
missing Time Lapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR II Vlogging advice
Samsung SL102 Vlogging advice
32
comes with face detection autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition in class (251g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
no external microphone socket
30
fast max aperture (f)
comes with face detect autofocus
lighter than competition in class (116g)
wide angle not good (35mm)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 pixels)
missing mic socket
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Ricoh GR II vs Samsung SL102 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR II and Samsung SL102
 Ricoh GR IISamsung SL102
General Information
Brand Name Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh GR II Samsung SL102
Alternative name - ES55
Type Large Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2015-06-17 2009-01-08
Physical type Large Sensor Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip GR Engine V -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 23.7 x 15.7mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 372.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4928 x 3264 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 25600 1600
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 9 -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28mm (1x) 35-105mm (3.0x)
Maximal aperture f/2.8-16.0 -
Macro focus range 10cm 10cm
Focal length multiplier 1.5 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 2.5"
Screen resolution 1,230k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (optional) None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 300s 8s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/1500s
Continuous shooting rate 4.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) -
Flash settings Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 251g (0.55 pounds) 116g (0.26 pounds)
Physical dimensions 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.6 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 13.7 not tested
DXO Low light score 1078 not tested
Other
Battery life 320 shots -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery model DB-65 -
Self timer Yes Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal
Card slots 1 1
Launch cost $599 $130