Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB1100F
89 Imaging
59 Features
55 Overall
57
67 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB1100F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
- 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
- Launched June 2015
- Replaced the Ricoh GR
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-875mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 512g - 125 x 87 x 96mm
- Introduced January 2014
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB1100F Overview
Here is a thorough review of the Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB1100F, one being a Large Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the GR II (16MP) and the WB1100F (16MP) is fairly similar but the GR II (APS-C) and WB1100F (1/2.3") have totally different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe GR II was announced 18 months later than the WB1100F making them a generation apart from each other. Both cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung WB1100F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the GR II scores vs the WB1100F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB1100F Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GR II and Samsung WB1100F. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR II Gallery and Samsung WB1100F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Samsung WB1100F
GR II | WB1100F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2015 | January 2014 | Fresher by 18 months | |
Display resolution | 1230k | 460k | Sharper display (+770k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB1100F over the Ricoh GR II
WB1100F | GR II |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR II and Samsung WB1100F
GR II | WB1100F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More exact focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display size | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Lack of Touch display |
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB1100F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera regularly, you will want to consider its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GR II has got external dimensions of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs) while the Samsung WB1100F has proportions of 125mm x 87mm x 96mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 3.8") with a weight of 512 grams (1.13 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB1100F in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the GR II against the WB1100F.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the GR II and WB1100F is 89 and 67 respectively.
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB1100F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to see the contrast between sensor sizing only by reviewing specifications. The graphic below should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the GR II and WB1100F.
Plainly, both of those cameras feature the identical MP but not the same sensor sizing. The GR II features the larger sensor which will make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult. The younger GR II is going to have a benefit in sensor tech.
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB1100F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB1100F Specifications
Ricoh GR II | Samsung WB1100F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GR II | Samsung WB1100F |
Class | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2015-06-17 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | GR Engine V | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 372.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 25-875mm (35.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-16.0 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 10cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 300 seconds | 8 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
Flash options | Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) | 1280 x 720 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 251 grams (0.55 lb) | 512 grams (1.13 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 125 x 87 x 96mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 3.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1078 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 images | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | DB-65 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $599 | $250 |