Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB350F
89 Imaging
59 Features
55 Overall
57
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
- 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
- Launched June 2015
- Succeeded the Ricoh GR
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Released January 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB350F Overview
Here is a detailed comparison of the Ricoh GR II versus Samsung WB350F, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the GR II (16MP) and the WB350F (16MP) is relatively well matched but the GR II (APS-C) and WB350F (1/2.3") feature different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe GR II was announced 18 months later than the WB350F which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung WB350F being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a detailed comparison, below is a quick summary of how the GR II scores against the WB350F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB350F Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GR II & Samsung WB350F. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR II Gallery & Samsung WB350F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Samsung WB350F
| GR II | WB350F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | June 2015 |  | January 2014 | Fresher by 18 months |
| Screen resolution | 1230k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+770k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Ricoh GR II
| WB350F | GR II | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GR II and Samsung WB350F
| GR II | WB350F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera often, you should think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR II provides outer dimensions of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") and a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB350F has dimensions of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") along with a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh GR II versus Samsung WB350F in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the GR II vs the WB350F.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the GR II and WB350F is 89 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to imagine the gap between sensor sizing purely by looking at a spec sheet. The visual below might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the GR II and WB350F.
Clearly, each of these cameras offer the same exact MP albeit different sensor sizing. The GR II contains the bigger sensor which is going to make achieving shallower depth of field easier. The more modern GR II provides an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB350F Specifications
| Ricoh GR II | Samsung WB350F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh GR II | Samsung WB350F |
| Class | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2015-06-17 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | GR Engine V | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 372.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 |
| Max resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-16.0 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | - |
| Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 1,230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 300 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 251 gr (0.55 lb) | 276 gr (0.61 lb) |
| Dimensions | 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 80 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 23.6 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.7 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 1078 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 320 shots | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | DB-65 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $599 | $260 |