Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB700
89 Imaging
59 Features
55 Overall
57
98 Imaging
37 Features
21 Overall
30
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
- 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
- Revealed June 2015
- Succeeded the Ricoh GR
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Introduced December 2010
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB700 Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Ricoh GR II and Samsung WB700, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the GR II (16MP) and the WB700 (14MP) is very comparable but the GR II (APS-C) and WB700 (1/2.3") offer different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe GR II was released 4 years later than the WB700 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung WB700 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a simple view of how the GR II grades against the WB700 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB700 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GR II & Samsung WB700. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh GR II Gallery & Samsung WB700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Samsung WB700
GR II | WB700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2015 | December 2010 | Fresher by 55 months | |
Focus manually | Very precise focusing | |||
Display resolution | 1230k | 614k | Sharper display (+616k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB700 over the Ricoh GR II
WB700 | GR II |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR II and Samsung WB700
GR II | WB700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither has Touch display |
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB700 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera, you will need to factor in its weight and size. The Ricoh GR II has outer measurements of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") along with a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs) while the Samsung WB700 has specifications of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh GR II and Samsung WB700 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the GR II against the WB700.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GR II and WB700 is 89 and 98 respectively.
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB700 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to imagine the gap in sensor sizing just by going through technical specs. The graphic here may provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the GR II and WB700.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The GR II featuring a larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF simpler and the Ricoh GR II will produce greater detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more modern GR II should have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB700 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB700 Specifications
Ricoh GR II | Samsung WB700 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GR II | Samsung WB700 |
Class | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2015-06-17 | 2010-12-28 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | GR Engine V | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 372.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
Full resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | - |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | () |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-16.0 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 10cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,230 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 300s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
Flash modes | Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) | 1280 x 720 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 251 grams (0.55 pounds) | - |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1078 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 images | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | DB-65 | - |
Self timer | Yes | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $599 | $300 |