Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB800F
89 Imaging
59 Features
55 Overall
57


92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
- 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
- Introduced June 2015
- Older Model is Ricoh GR
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013

Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Lets examine more closely at the Ricoh GR II versus Samsung WB800F, one is a Large Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the GR II (16MP) and the WB800F (16MP) is pretty well matched but the GR II (APS-C) and WB800F (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizing.

The GR II was introduced 2 years after the WB800F which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera.
Before diving through a in-depth comparison, below is a short summation of how the GR II grades vs the WB800F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GR II and Samsung WB800F. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh GR II Gallery and Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Samsung WB800F
GR II | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2015 | ![]() | January 2013 | Newer by 30 months |
Screen resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper screen (+770k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Ricoh GR II
WB800F | GR II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GR II and Samsung WB800F
GR II | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen |
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GR II offers outer measurements of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") with a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB800F has measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh GR II versus Samsung WB800F in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the GR II against the WB800F.

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the GR II and WB800F is 89 and 92 respectively.

Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's difficult to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions merely by looking at specifications. The pic underneath may provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the GR II and WB800F.
Plainly, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact resolution albeit different sensor dimensions. The GR II has got the bigger sensor which will make getting shallower DOF less difficult. The fresher GR II should have an advantage in sensor tech.

Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
Ricoh GR II | Samsung WB800F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GR II | Samsung WB800F |
Class | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2015-06-17 | 2013-01-07 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | GR Engine V | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 372.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-16.0 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 10cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 300 seconds | 16 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
Flash options | Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 251 grams (0.55 pounds) | 218 grams (0.48 pounds) |
Dimensions | 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1078 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 images | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | DB-65 | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $599 | $300 |