Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB850F
89 Imaging
59 Features
55 Overall
57
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/697bb/697bb1cdcdb77b7647f93783faecc3a3a6424bc9" alt="Ricoh GR II front Ricoh GR II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/15418/15418ee0968ee6e7d25e3170c052632adc898e25" alt="Samsung WB850F front Samsung WB850F front"
91 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB850F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
- 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
- Announced June 2015
- Superseded the Ricoh GR
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 250g - 109 x 62 x 25mm
- Launched January 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB850F Overview
Here, we are contrasting the Ricoh GR II and Samsung WB850F, former is a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the GR II (16MP) and the WB850F (16MP) is fairly well matched but the GR II (APS-C) and WB850F (1/2.3") offer different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The GR II was released 3 years after the WB850F which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung WB850F being a Compact camera.
Before going into a complete comparison, here is a brief overview of how the GR II scores versus the WB850F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB850F Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GR II & Samsung WB850F. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR II Gallery & Samsung WB850F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Samsung WB850F
GR II | WB850F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | June 2015 | ![]() | January 2012 | Newer by 42 months |
Display resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 614k | Clearer display (+616k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB850F over the Ricoh GR II
WB850F | GR II |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR II and Samsung WB850F
GR II | WB850F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch display |
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB850F Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera often, you should think about its weight and volume. The Ricoh GR II comes with outer measurements of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") having a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs) and the Samsung WB850F has sizing of 109mm x 62mm x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") having a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
See the Ricoh GR II and Samsung WB850F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using at that moment. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the GR II vs the WB850F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fce6e/fce6e55deb1505f5f2c06ac1fb5f3fa1a3087271" alt="Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB850F size comparison Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB850F size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the GR II and WB850F is 89 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f16e/0f16efd05ec178d122889b4f02a49511f54ae006" alt="Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB850F top view buttons comparison Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB850F top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB850F Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions simply by checking specifications. The picture here should give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the GR II and WB850F.
To sum up, each of the cameras feature the identical MP but different sensor dimensions. The GR II has the larger sensor which should make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult. The newer GR II provides a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d91c/2d91c9bebabea1fdb236697b4ad4593d85d0abc3" alt="Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB850F sensor size comparison Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB850F sensor size comparison"
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB850F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc2d1/fc2d141e29c0582a6c9fd22ff03f4237be74b74a" alt="Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB850F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB850F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Ricoh GR II vs Samsung WB850F Specifications
Ricoh GR II | Samsung WB850F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GR II | Samsung WB850F |
Class | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2015-06-17 | 2012-01-09 |
Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | GR Engine V | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 372.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-16.0 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 10cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,230k dots | 614k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | - | AMOLED display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 300s | 8s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 251 gr (0.55 lbs) | 250 gr (0.55 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 109 x 62 x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 13.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1078 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 images | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | DB-65 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $599 | $599 |