Ricoh GR II vs Sigma SD14
89 Imaging
59 Features
55 Overall
57
59 Imaging
43 Features
30 Overall
37
Ricoh GR II vs Sigma SD14 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
- 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
- Revealed June 2015
- Old Model is Ricoh GR
(Full Review)
- 5MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800 (Push to 1600)
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 750g - 144 x 107 x 81mm
- Released September 2006
- Old Model is Sigma SD10
- Successor is Sigma SD15
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Ricoh GR II vs Sigma SD14 Overview
Following is a comprehensive analysis of the Ricoh GR II versus Sigma SD14, one is a Large Sensor Compact and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Ricoh and Sigma. There exists a significant gap between the resolutions of the GR II (16MP) and SD14 (5MP) but they come with the same exact sensor size (APS-C).
Photography GlossaryThe GR II was launched 8 years after the SD14 which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sigma SD14 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the GR II scores versus the SD14 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh GR II vs Sigma SD14 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GR II and Sigma SD14. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh GR II Gallery and Sigma SD14 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Sigma SD14
| GR II | SD14 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | June 2015 |  | September 2006 | More modern by 107 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 1230k |  | 150k | Clearer screen (+1080k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD14 over the Ricoh GR II
| SD14 | GR II |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR II and Sigma SD14
| GR II | SD14 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither offers Touch screen |
Ricoh GR II vs Sigma SD14 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR II offers exterior measurements of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") with a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs) whilst the Sigma SD14 has dimensions of 144mm x 107mm x 81mm (5.7" x 4.2" x 3.2") with a weight of 750 grams (1.65 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh GR II versus Sigma SD14 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the GR II vs the SD14.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GR II and SD14 is 89 and 59 respectively.
Ricoh GR II vs Sigma SD14 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to visualize the difference between sensor sizes just by reading specifications. The image here may give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the GR II and SD14.
To sum up, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Ricoh GR II to offer greater detail utilizing its extra 11 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots far more aggressively. The younger GR II provides an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Ricoh GR II vs Sigma SD14 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Ricoh GR II vs Sigma SD14 Specifications
| Ricoh GR II | Sigma SD14 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sigma |
| Model | Ricoh GR II | Sigma SD14 |
| Type | Large Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
| Revealed | 2015-06-17 | 2006-09-26 |
| Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | GR Engine V | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 372.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 5MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 2640 x 1760 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 800 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-16.0 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 76 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 1.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Display resolution | 1,230 thousand dot | 150 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 98% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.6x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 300 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
| Flash options | Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 251g (0.55 lb) | 750g (1.65 lb) |
| Dimensions | 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 144 x 107 x 81mm (5.7" x 4.2" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 80 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 23.6 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 13.7 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 1078 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 320 shots | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | DB-65 | - |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash Type I or II |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $599 | $198 |
