Ricoh GR II vs Sigma Quattro
89 Imaging
59 Features
55 Overall
57
63 Imaging
69 Features
56 Overall
63
Ricoh GR II vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
- 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
- Released June 2015
- Superseded the Ricoh GR
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Introduced February 2016
Ricoh GR II vs Sigma Quattro Overview
Below, we are reviewing the Ricoh GR II vs Sigma Quattro, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Ricoh and Sigma. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the GR II (16MP) and Quattro (29MP) but they feature the exact same sensor size (APS-C).
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe GR II was unveiled 8 months prior to the Quattro so they are both of a similar age. Both cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting through a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the GR II grades against the Quattro with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh GR II vs Sigma Quattro Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GR II & Sigma sd Quattro. The full galleries are available at Ricoh GR II Gallery & Sigma Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Sigma Quattro
GR II | Quattro |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Ricoh GR II
Quattro | GR II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2016 | June 2015 | Fresher by 8 months | |
Display resolution | 1620k | 1230k | Sharper display (+390k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh GR II and Sigma Quattro
GR II | Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very exact focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display size | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither comes with Touch display |
Ricoh GR II vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and volume. The Ricoh GR II comes with external dimensions of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") along with a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs) whilst the Sigma Quattro has sizing of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh GR II vs Sigma Quattro in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the GR II and the Quattro.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GR II and Quattro is 89 and 63 respectively.
Ricoh GR II vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizing simply by researching specifications. The visual below might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR II and Quattro.
To sum up, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Sigma Quattro to provide you with extra detail having an extra 13MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The older GR II will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Ricoh GR II vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR II vs Sigma Quattro Specifications
Ricoh GR II | Sigma sd Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Sigma |
Model | Ricoh GR II | Sigma sd Quattro |
Category | Large Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2015-06-17 | 2016-02-23 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | GR Engine V | Dual TRUE III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 372.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 29MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 5424 x 3616 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | - |
Max aperture | f/2.8-16.0 | - |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,230k dot | 1,620k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 300 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames/s | 3.8 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) | - |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | - |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 251 gr (0.55 lb) | 625 gr (1.38 lb) |
Dimensions | 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 13.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1078 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photos | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | DB-65 | BP-61 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $599 | $738 |