Clicky

Ricoh GR II vs Sony A300

Portability
89
Imaging
59
Features
55
Overall
57
Ricoh GR II front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 front
Portability
64
Imaging
49
Features
45
Overall
47

Ricoh GR II vs Sony A300 Key Specs

Ricoh GR II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
  • 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
  • Introduced June 2015
  • Succeeded the Ricoh GR
Sony A300
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 632g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
  • Introduced January 2008
  • Successor is Sony A330
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Ricoh GR II vs Sony A300 Overview

Here is a detailed comparison of the Ricoh GR II and Sony A300, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Ricoh and Sony. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the GR II (16MP) and A300 (10MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor size (APS-C).

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The GR II was launched 7 years later than the A300 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony A300 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before diving right into a thorough comparison, here is a brief overview of how the GR II matches up against the A300 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Sony A300

 GR II A300 
IntroducedJune 2015January 2008Fresher by 90 months
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1230k230kSharper display (+1000k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony A300 over the Ricoh GR II

 A300 GR II 
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display

Common features in the Ricoh GR II and Sony A300

 GR II A300 
Focus manually Very exact focusing
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch display Neither provides Touch display

Ricoh GR II vs Sony A300 Physical Comparison

If you're planning to carry your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and size. The Ricoh GR II provides outer dimensions of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") along with a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs) whilst the Sony A300 has specifications of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") along with a weight of 632 grams (1.39 lbs).

Look at the Ricoh GR II and Sony A300 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose at that moment. Following is a front view scale comparison of the GR II versus the A300.

Ricoh GR II vs Sony A300 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GR II and A300 is 89 and 64 respectively.

Ricoh GR II vs Sony A300 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR II vs Sony A300 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it can be tough to picture the contrast in sensor sizing purely by researching specifications. The photograph here will give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the GR II and A300.

To sum up, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You can anticipate the Ricoh GR II to provide you with more detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images more aggressively. The more recent GR II provides an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.

Ricoh GR II vs Sony A300 sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR II vs Sony A300 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR II vs Sony A300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GR II Portrait photography details
Sony A300 Portrait photography details
75
you can focus manually
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
comes with face detection autofocus
delivers RAW files
59
manual focus
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
megapixel count low (10MP)
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Street photography with Ricoh GR II
Street photography with Sony A300
74
good sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
lighter than competitors in class (251g)
great high ISO (25,600)
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
74
screen tilts up and down
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GR II Sports photography advice
Sony A300 Sports photography advice
50
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
comes with tracking autofocus
can't change focal length (28mm)
slow frames per second (4.0 fps)
no image stabilization
does not have phase detect autofocus
54
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
comes with phase detect auto focus
slow fps (3.0 frames per second)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Ricoh GR II
Travel photography with Sony A300
67
lighter than competitors in class (251 grams)
decent megapixels (16MP)
built-in flash
lack of Time Lapse mode
does not have a selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
45
has built in flash
lack of Time Lapse function
megapixel count low (10MP)
does not have selfie friendly screen
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GR II Landscape photography information
Sony A300 Landscape photography information
59
you can focus manually
pretty good screen size (3")
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
great high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (28mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
no image stabilization
lack of Time Lapse mode
57
manual focus
swap lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
tiny screen (2.7")
megapixel count low (10MP)
lack of Time Lapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR II as a Vlogging camera
Sony A300 as a Vlogging camera
32
comes with face detection autofocus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competitors in class (251g)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
lack of external mic support
9
can't record video
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Ricoh GR II vs Sony A300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR II and Sony A300
 Ricoh GR IISony Alpha DSLR-A300
General Information
Brand Ricoh Sony
Model Ricoh GR II Sony Alpha DSLR-A300
Class Large Sensor Compact Entry-Level DSLR
Introduced 2015-06-17 2008-01-30
Body design Large Sensor Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Powered by GR Engine V -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size APS-C APS-C
Sensor dimensions 23.7 x 15.7mm 23.6 x 15.8mm
Sensor surface area 372.1mm² 372.9mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 -
Max resolution 4928 x 3264 3872 x 2592
Max native ISO 25600 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 9 9
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens focal range 28mm (1x) -
Highest aperture f/2.8-16.0 -
Macro focus distance 10cm -
Number of lenses - 143
Focal length multiplier 1.5 1.5
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Tilting
Screen diagonal 3 inches 2.7 inches
Screen resolution 1,230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (optional) Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.49x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 300 seconds 30 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 4.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash options Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) -
Max video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 251 grams (0.55 lbs) 632 grams (1.39 lbs)
Physical dimensions 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 80 64
DXO Color Depth score 23.6 22.5
DXO Dynamic range score 13.7 11.4
DXO Low light score 1078 538
Other
Battery life 320 images -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model DB-65 -
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC Compact Flash
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at release $599 $0