Ricoh GR II vs Sony A300
89 Imaging
59 Features
55 Overall
57
64 Imaging
49 Features
45 Overall
47
Ricoh GR II vs Sony A300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
- 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
- Introduced June 2015
- Succeeded the Ricoh GR
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 632g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
- Introduced January 2008
- Successor is Sony A330
Ricoh GR II vs Sony A300 Overview
Here is a detailed comparison of the Ricoh GR II and Sony A300, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Ricoh and Sony. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the GR II (16MP) and A300 (10MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor size (APS-C).
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe GR II was launched 7 years later than the A300 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony A300 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving right into a thorough comparison, here is a brief overview of how the GR II matches up against the A300 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh GR II vs Sony A300 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GR II & Sony Alpha DSLR-A300. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR II Gallery & Sony A300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Sony A300
GR II | A300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2015 | January 2008 | Fresher by 90 months | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1230k | 230k | Sharper display (+1000k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A300 over the Ricoh GR II
A300 | GR II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Ricoh GR II and Sony A300
GR II | A300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither provides Touch display |
Ricoh GR II vs Sony A300 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and size. The Ricoh GR II provides outer dimensions of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") along with a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs) whilst the Sony A300 has specifications of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") along with a weight of 632 grams (1.39 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh GR II and Sony A300 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose at that moment. Following is a front view scale comparison of the GR II versus the A300.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GR II and A300 is 89 and 64 respectively.
Ricoh GR II vs Sony A300 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to picture the contrast in sensor sizing purely by researching specifications. The photograph here will give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the GR II and A300.
To sum up, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You can anticipate the Ricoh GR II to provide you with more detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images more aggressively. The more recent GR II provides an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh GR II vs Sony A300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR II vs Sony A300 Specifications
Ricoh GR II | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh GR II | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 |
Class | Large Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Introduced | 2015-06-17 | 2008-01-30 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | GR Engine V | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 372.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
Max resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 3872 x 2592 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-16.0 | - |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 300 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) | - |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 251 grams (0.55 lbs) | 632 grams (1.39 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 80 | 64 |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.6 | 22.5 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 13.7 | 11.4 |
DXO Low light score | 1078 | 538 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 images | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | DB-65 | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $599 | $0 |