Clicky

Ricoh GR II vs Sony QX1

Portability
89
Imaging
59
Features
55
Overall
57
Ricoh GR II front
 
Sony Alpha QX1 front
Portability
90
Imaging
63
Features
48
Overall
57

Ricoh GR II vs Sony QX1 Key Specs

Ricoh GR II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
  • 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
  • Launched June 2015
  • Succeeded the Ricoh GR
Sony QX1
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • " Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 16000
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 216g - 74 x 70 x 53mm
  • Announced September 2014
Photography Glossary

Ricoh GR II vs Sony QX1 Overview

The following is a thorough comparison of the Ricoh GR II versus Sony QX1, one is a Large Sensor Compact and the other is a Lens-style by companies Ricoh and Sony. The resolution of the GR II (16MP) and the QX1 (20MP) is very close and both cameras offer the identical sensor dimensions (APS-C).

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The GR II was launched 10 months after the QX1 which means that they are of a similar generation. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony QX1 being a Lens-style camera.

Before getting right into a detailed comparison, here is a short introduction of how the GR II matches up against the QX1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Sony QX1

 GR II QX1 
AnnouncedJune 2015September 2014Newer by 10 months
Display size3""Larger display (+3")
Display resolution1230k0kCrisper display (+1230k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony QX1 over the Ricoh GR II

 QX1 GR II 
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Ricoh GR II and Sony QX1

 GR II QX1 
Manually focus Dial exact focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen

Ricoh GR II vs Sony QX1 Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to travel with your camera, you need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GR II offers exterior measurements of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") along with a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs) and the Sony QX1 has measurements of 74mm x 70mm x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") and a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs).

Check out the Ricoh GR II versus Sony QX1 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you choose at the time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the GR II and the QX1.

Ricoh GR II vs Sony QX1 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GR II and QX1 is 89 and 90 respectively.

Ricoh GR II vs Sony QX1 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR II vs Sony QX1 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it's hard to envision the difference in sensor dimensions purely by viewing technical specs. The image below will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the GR II and QX1.

As you can tell, both cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the Sony QX1 to provide you with extra detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The younger GR II is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.

Ricoh GR II vs Sony QX1 sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR II vs Sony QX1 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR II vs Sony QX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GR II as a Portrait photography camera
Sony QX1 as a Portrait photography camera
75
has manual focus
decent megapixels (16MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
offers face detect focusing
exports RAW formats
66
has manual focus
megapixel count good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
offers face detect focus
saves RAW files
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Street photography with Ricoh GR II
Street photography with Sony QX1
74
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
lighter than average (251 grams)
very good ISO range (25,600)
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
69
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
saves RAW files
features focus via touch
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
more heavy than others in class (216 grams)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Ricoh GR II
Sports photography with Sony QX1
50
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
offers tracking focus
focal length is fixed (28mm)
slow continuous shooting (4.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
lack of phase detect AF
56
megapixel count good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
great battery (440 shots)
max frames per second low (4.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
lacks phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR II Travel photography features
Sony QX1 Travel photography features
67
lighter than average (251g)
decent megapixels (16MP)
flash built-in
lack of Timelapse recording
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
71
great battery (440 CIPA)
features focus via touch
megapixel count good (20MP)
has built in flash
does not have Timelapse recording
more heavy than others in class (216 grams)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GR II Landscape photography advice
Sony QX1 Landscape photography advice
59
has manual focus
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
very good ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
no image stabilization
lack of Timelapse recording
64
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Sony E mount)
megapixel count good (20MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
saves RAW files
great battery (440 per charge)
tiny screen (")
lack of manual exposure
no image stabilization
does not have Timelapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR II Vlogging info
Sony QX1 Vlogging info
32
offers face detect focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than average (251g)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
lack of microphone port
32
touch screen
offers face detect focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
does not have microphone socket
more heavy than others in class (216 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Ricoh GR II vs Sony QX1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR II and Sony QX1
 Ricoh GR IISony Alpha QX1
General Information
Make Ricoh Sony
Model Ricoh GR II Sony Alpha QX1
Class Large Sensor Compact Lens-style
Launched 2015-06-17 2014-09-03
Physical type Large Sensor Compact Lens-style
Sensor Information
Processor Chip GR Engine V Bionz X
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size APS-C APS-C
Sensor measurements 23.7 x 15.7mm 23.2 x 15.4mm
Sensor surface area 372.1mm² 357.3mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 20MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3 and 3:2
Highest resolution 4928 x 3264 5456 x 3632
Highest native ISO 25600 16000
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points 9 25
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Sony E
Lens focal range 28mm (1x) -
Maximum aperture f/2.8-16.0 -
Macro focus distance 10cm -
Focal length multiplier 1.5 1.6
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inches -
Display resolution 1,230 thousand dots 0 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (optional) None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 300s 30s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting rate 4.0 frames per sec 4.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) 4.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash modes Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless Off, auto, fill, slow sync, rear sync
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) 1920 x 1080 (30p)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 251g (0.55 lb) 216g (0.48 lb)
Physical dimensions 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") 74 x 70 x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.6 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 13.7 not tested
DXO Low light score 1078 not tested
Other
Battery life 320 shots 440 shots
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model DB-65 NP-FW50
Self timer Yes Yes (2, 10 secs)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro
Card slots Single Single
Price at launch $599 $500