Ricoh GR II vs Sony T99
89 Imaging
59 Features
55 Overall
57
96 Imaging
37 Features
27 Overall
33
Ricoh GR II vs Sony T99 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
- 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
- Revealed June 2015
- Succeeded the Ricoh GR
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 121g - 93 x 56 x 17mm
- Revealed July 2010
Ricoh GR II vs Sony T99 Overview
Below is a extensive assessment of the Ricoh GR II vs Sony T99, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact by brands Ricoh and Sony. The resolution of the GR II (16MP) and the T99 (14MP) is very close but the GR II (APS-C) and T99 (1/2.3") use different sensor measurements.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe GR II was manufactured 5 years later than the T99 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony T99 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise view of how the GR II grades vs the T99 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh GR II vs Sony T99 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GR II & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh GR II Gallery & Sony T99 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Sony T99
GR II | T99 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | June 2015 | July 2010 | More recent by 61 months | |
Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
Display resolution | 1230k | 230k | Clearer display (+1000k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony T99 over the Ricoh GR II
T99 | GR II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GR II and Sony T99
GR II | T99 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Ricoh GR II vs Sony T99 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GR II offers outside measurements of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs) whilst the Sony T99 has proportions of 93mm x 56mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
See the Ricoh GR II vs Sony T99 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the GR II compared to the T99.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the GR II and T99 is 89 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh GR II vs Sony T99 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very difficult to imagine the difference in sensor measurements only by looking through specs. The visual below might provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the GR II and T99.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The GR II featuring a larger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh easier and the Ricoh GR II will result in extra detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images far more aggressively. The more recent GR II should have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh GR II vs Sony T99 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR II vs Sony T99 Specifications
Ricoh GR II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh GR II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T99 |
Class | Large Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2015-06-17 | 2010-07-08 |
Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | GR Engine V | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 372.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-16.0 | f/3.5-4.6 |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 300 seconds | 2 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1250 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.60 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red eye, Slow syncro |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 251 grams (0.55 lbs) | 121 grams (0.27 lbs) |
Dimensions | 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 93 x 56 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 13.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1078 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photos | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | DB-65 | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait1, portrait2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $599 | $179 |