Clicky

Ricoh GR II vs Sony TX1

Portability
89
Imaging
59
Features
55
Overall
57
Ricoh GR II front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 front
Portability
96
Imaging
33
Features
21
Overall
28

Ricoh GR II vs Sony TX1 Key Specs

Ricoh GR II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
  • 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
  • Released June 2015
  • Superseded the Ricoh GR
Sony TX1
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 35-140mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
  • 142g - 94 x 58 x 17mm
  • Announced August 2009
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Ricoh GR II vs Sony TX1 Overview

On this page, we will be comparing the Ricoh GR II and Sony TX1, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Ricoh and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the GR II (16MP) and TX1 (10MP) and the GR II (APS-C) and TX1 (1/2.4") offer different sensor dimensions.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The GR II was brought out 5 years later than the TX1 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony TX1 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before diving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a short summary of how the GR II scores versus the TX1 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Sony TX1

 GR II TX1 
AnnouncedJune 2015August 2009More recent by 72 months
Manual focus Dial accurate focusing
Screen resolution1230k230kCrisper screen (+1000k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony TX1 over the Ricoh GR II

 TX1 GR II 
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Ricoh GR II and Sony TX1

 GR II TX1 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen sizing
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen

Ricoh GR II vs Sony TX1 Physical Comparison

For those who are looking to lug around your camera, you will have to think about its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GR II enjoys exterior dimensions of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") having a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs) and the Sony TX1 has proportions of 94mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).

Compare the Ricoh GR II and Sony TX1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have at the time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the GR II against the TX1.

Ricoh GR II vs Sony TX1 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GR II and TX1 is 89 and 96 respectively.

Ricoh GR II vs Sony TX1 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR II vs Sony TX1 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it can be hard to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements just by reviewing specs. The visual underneath will offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR II and TX1.

As you can plainly see, both of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The GR II because of its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Ricoh GR II will offer greater detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs more aggressively. The more modern GR II should have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.

Ricoh GR II vs Sony TX1 sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR II vs Sony TX1 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR II vs Sony TX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GR II Portrait photography advice
Sony TX1 Portrait photography advice
75
focusing manually
decent MP (16MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
comes with face detect focus
delivers RAW formats
19
no manual focus
lack of manual exposure
no external flash support
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.4")
no RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Ricoh GR II as a Street photography camera
Sony TX1 as a Street photography camera
74
good sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
lighter than average (251g)
very good high ISO (25,600)
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
57
built in image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
small sensor size (1/2.4")
no RAW files
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GR II as a Sports photography camera
Sony TX1 as a Sports photography camera
50
decent MP (16MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
comes with tracking focus
focal length is fixed (28mm)
very slow continuous shooting (4.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
lack of phase detect auto focus
24
built in image stabilization (Optical)
low max shutter speed (1/1,250s)
no shutter priority mode
megapixel count low (10MP)
small sensor size (1/2.4")
no phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR II Travel photography advice
Sony TX1 Travel photography advice
67
lighter than average (251g)
decent MP (16MP)
built-in flash
lack of Time Lapse function
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
51
flash built-in
missing Timelapse function
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GR II Landscape photography info
Sony TX1 Landscape photography info
59
focusing manually
nice screen size (3 inch)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
very good high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
lack of image stabilization
lack of Time Lapse function
31
screen size is decent (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
no manual focus
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
lack of manual exposure
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.4")
no RAW files
missing Timelapse function
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR II Vlogging info
Sony TX1 Vlogging info
32
comes with face detect focus
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than average (251g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
lack of mic port
28
touch screen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not great (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing external microphone port
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Ricoh GR II vs Sony TX1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR II and Sony TX1
 Ricoh GR IISony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1
General Information
Brand Ricoh Sony
Model Ricoh GR II Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1
Type Large Sensor Compact Ultracompact
Released 2015-06-17 2009-08-06
Body design Large Sensor Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Chip GR Engine V Bionz
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.4"
Sensor measurements 23.7 x 15.7mm 6.104 x 4.578mm
Sensor area 372.1mm² 27.9mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4928 x 3264 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 25600 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 125
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 9 9
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28mm (1x) 35-140mm (4.0x)
Largest aperture f/2.8-16.0 f/3.5-4.6
Macro focus distance 10cm 8cm
Crop factor 1.5 5.9
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 1,230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (optional) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 300 seconds 2 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/1250 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 4.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) 3.00 m
Flash options Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow sync
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 251 grams (0.55 lbs) 142 grams (0.31 lbs)
Physical dimensions 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") 94 x 58 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.6 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 13.7 not tested
DXO Low light score 1078 not tested
Other
Battery life 320 images -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model DB-65 -
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Price at launch $599 $350