Ricoh GR II vs Sony TX1
89 Imaging
59 Features
55 Overall
57
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Ricoh GR II vs Sony TX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
- 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
- Released June 2015
- Superseded the Ricoh GR
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 142g - 94 x 58 x 17mm
- Announced August 2009
Ricoh GR II vs Sony TX1 Overview
On this page, we will be comparing the Ricoh GR II and Sony TX1, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Ricoh and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the GR II (16MP) and TX1 (10MP) and the GR II (APS-C) and TX1 (1/2.4") offer different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe GR II was brought out 5 years later than the TX1 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony TX1 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a short summary of how the GR II scores versus the TX1 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh GR II vs Sony TX1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GR II & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh GR II Gallery & Sony TX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Sony TX1
GR II | TX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | June 2015 | August 2009 | More recent by 72 months | |
Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Screen resolution | 1230k | 230k | Crisper screen (+1000k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony TX1 over the Ricoh GR II
TX1 | GR II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GR II and Sony TX1
GR II | TX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Ricoh GR II vs Sony TX1 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera, you will have to think about its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GR II enjoys exterior dimensions of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") having a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs) and the Sony TX1 has proportions of 94mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh GR II and Sony TX1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have at the time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the GR II against the TX1.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GR II and TX1 is 89 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh GR II vs Sony TX1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements just by reviewing specs. The visual underneath will offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR II and TX1.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The GR II because of its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Ricoh GR II will offer greater detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs more aggressively. The more modern GR II should have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh GR II vs Sony TX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR II vs Sony TX1 Specifications
Ricoh GR II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Sony |
Model | Ricoh GR II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 |
Type | Large Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Released | 2015-06-17 | 2009-08-06 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | GR Engine V | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.4" |
Sensor measurements | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
Sensor area | 372.1mm² | 27.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-16.0 | f/3.5-4.6 |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | 8cm |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 300 seconds | 2 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1250 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 251 grams (0.55 lbs) | 142 grams (0.31 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 94 x 58 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 13.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1078 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 images | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | DB-65 | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $599 | $350 |