Ricoh GR II vs Sony TX200V
89 Imaging
59 Features
55 Overall
57
96 Imaging
42 Features
48 Overall
44
Ricoh GR II vs Sony TX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
- 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
- Revealed June 2015
- Succeeded the Ricoh GR
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
- Announced January 2012
Ricoh GR II vs Sony TX200V Overview
Here, we will be analyzing the Ricoh GR II vs Sony TX200V, former is a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Ricoh and Sony. The resolution of the GR II (16MP) and the TX200V (18MP) is relatively similar but the GR II (APS-C) and TX200V (1/2.3") boast different sensor sizing.
Photography GlossaryThe GR II was unveiled 3 years after the TX200V which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony TX200V being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the GR II grades versus the TX200V in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh GR II vs Sony TX200V Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GR II & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V. The full galleries are available at Ricoh GR II Gallery & Sony TX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Sony TX200V
GR II | TX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | June 2015 | January 2012 | Newer by 42 months | |
Manual focus | Dial precise focus |
Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Ricoh GR II
TX200V | GR II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3.3" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GR II and Sony TX200V
GR II | TX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen resolution | 1230k | 1230k | Identical screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Ricoh GR II vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and size. The Ricoh GR II offers exterior measurements of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs) whilst the Sony TX200V has specifications of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") and a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh GR II vs Sony TX200V in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the GR II compared to the TX200V.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the GR II and TX200V is 89 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh GR II vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's tough to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by going over specs. The pic here may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the GR II and TX200V.
All in all, the two cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The GR II having a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Sony TX200V will offer you extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The younger GR II should have an advantage in sensor tech.
Ricoh GR II vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR II vs Sony TX200V Specifications
Ricoh GR II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh GR II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V |
Category | Large Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2015-06-17 | 2012-01-30 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | GR Engine V | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 372.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 4896 x 3672 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-16.0 | f/3.5-4.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3.3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,230 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | - | 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 300s | 2s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.10 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 251 gr (0.55 pounds) | 129 gr (0.28 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1078 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photographs | 220 photographs |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | DB-65 | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $599 | $500 |