Clicky

Ricoh GR II vs Sony TX200V

Portability
89
Imaging
59
Features
55
Overall
57
Ricoh GR II front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V front
Portability
96
Imaging
42
Features
48
Overall
44

Ricoh GR II vs Sony TX200V Key Specs

Ricoh GR II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
  • 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
  • Revealed June 2015
  • Succeeded the Ricoh GR
Sony TX200V
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
  • 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
  • Announced January 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Ricoh GR II vs Sony TX200V Overview

Here, we will be analyzing the Ricoh GR II vs Sony TX200V, former is a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Ricoh and Sony. The resolution of the GR II (16MP) and the TX200V (18MP) is relatively similar but the GR II (APS-C) and TX200V (1/2.3") boast different sensor sizing.

Photography Glossary

The GR II was unveiled 3 years after the TX200V which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony TX200V being a Ultracompact camera.

Before going straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the GR II grades versus the TX200V in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Sony TX200V

 GR II TX200V 
AnnouncedJune 2015January 2012Newer by 42 months
Manual focus Dial precise focus

Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Ricoh GR II

 TX200V GR II 
Screen size3.3"3"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Ricoh GR II and Sony TX200V

 GR II TX200V 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen resolution1230k1230kIdentical screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen

Ricoh GR II vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison

For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and size. The Ricoh GR II offers exterior measurements of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs) whilst the Sony TX200V has specifications of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") and a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).

Look at the Ricoh GR II vs Sony TX200V in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the GR II compared to the TX200V.

Ricoh GR II vs Sony TX200V size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the GR II and TX200V is 89 and 96 respectively.

Ricoh GR II vs Sony TX200V top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR II vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison

Usually, it's tough to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by going over specs. The pic here may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the GR II and TX200V.

All in all, the two cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The GR II having a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Sony TX200V will offer you extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The younger GR II should have an advantage in sensor tech.

Ricoh GR II vs Sony TX200V sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR II vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR II vs Sony TX200V Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Ricoh GR II
Portrait photography with Sony TX200V
75
manual focus
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
supports face detection focusing
supports RAW formats
36
MP count decent (18 megapixels)
supports face detect focus
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not possible
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Street photography with Ricoh GR II
Street photography with Sony TX200V
74
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
lighter than average (251 grams)
very good ISO range (25,600)
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
68
built in image stabilization (Optical)
features focus by touch
environment proofing
no articulating screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GR II as a Sports photography camera
Sony TX200V as a Sports photography camera
50
resolution is good (16MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
supports tracking autofocus
focal length is fixed (28mm)
low frames per second (4.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
lacks phase detect AF
49
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (18 megapixels)
supports tracking focus
environment proofing
no shutter priority
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR II Travel photography features
Sony TX200V Travel photography features
67
lighter than average (251g)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
lack of Timelapse mode
display is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.8)
71
environment proofing
features focus by touch
MP count decent (18 megapixels)
has built in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
does not have Timelapse function
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GR II Landscape photography information
Sony TX200V Landscape photography information
59
manual focus
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
resolution is good (16MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
very good ISO range (25,600)
supports RAW formats
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
lack of image stabilization
lack of Timelapse mode
47
pretty wide (28mm)
screen is a decent size (3.3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (18 megapixels)
environment proofing
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
manual exposure not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
does not have Timelapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR II Vlogging details
Sony TX200V Vlogging details
32
supports face detection focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than average (251 grams)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
lack of external microphone port
35
pretty wide (28mm)
has touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detect focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
does not have microphone port
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Ricoh GR II vs Sony TX200V Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR II and Sony TX200V
 Ricoh GR IISony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V
General Information
Brand Ricoh Sony
Model type Ricoh GR II Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V
Category Large Sensor Compact Ultracompact
Revealed 2015-06-17 2012-01-30
Body design Large Sensor Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor GR Engine V BIONZ
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 23.7 x 15.7mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 372.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 18 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 4928 x 3264 4896 x 3672
Max native ISO 25600 12800
Min native ISO 100 64
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 9 9
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28mm (1x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Highest aperture f/2.8-16.0 f/3.5-4.8
Macro focusing distance 10cm 3cm
Focal length multiplier 1.5 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 3.3"
Resolution of screen 1,230 thousand dot 1,230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen tech - 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (optional) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 300s 2s
Highest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/1600s
Continuous shooting speed 4.0 frames per sec 10.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) 3.10 m
Flash settings Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 251 gr (0.55 pounds) 129 gr (0.28 pounds)
Physical dimensions 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 23.6 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 13.7 not tested
DXO Low light rating 1078 not tested
Other
Battery life 320 photographs 220 photographs
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID DB-65 NP-BN
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots 1 1
Launch pricing $599 $500