Ricoh GR II vs Sony TX9
89 Imaging
59 Features
55 Overall
57
95 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
Ricoh GR II vs Sony TX9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
- 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
- Revealed June 2015
- Earlier Model is Ricoh GR
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 149g - 98 x 60 x 18mm
- Introduced July 2010
Ricoh GR II vs Sony TX9 Overview
Below is a complete comparison of the Ricoh GR II and Sony TX9, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Ricoh and Sony. There is a considerable difference among the image resolutions of the GR II (16MP) and TX9 (12MP) and the GR II (APS-C) and TX9 (1/2.3") boast different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe GR II was brought out 5 years later than the TX9 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony TX9 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a quick overview of how the GR II grades versus the TX9 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh GR II vs Sony TX9 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GR II & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh GR II Gallery & Sony TX9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Sony TX9
GR II | TX9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2015 | July 2010 | More recent by 61 months | |
Screen resolution | 1230k | 922k | Clearer screen (+308k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony TX9 over the Ricoh GR II
TX9 | GR II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GR II and Sony TX9
GR II | TX9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Ricoh GR II vs Sony TX9 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera often, you have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GR II features physical measurements of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") along with a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs) and the Sony TX9 has proportions of 98mm x 60mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 149 grams (0.33 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh GR II and Sony TX9 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the GR II vs the TX9.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the GR II and TX9 is 89 and 95 respectively.
Ricoh GR II vs Sony TX9 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's tough to picture the gap in sensor measurements purely by checking out a spec sheet. The photograph here might provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the GR II and TX9.
Clearly, both of the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The GR II featuring a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Ricoh GR II will provide extra detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more modern GR II should have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh GR II vs Sony TX9 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR II vs Sony TX9 Specifications
Ricoh GR II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh GR II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9 |
Class | Large Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2015-06-17 | 2010-07-08 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | GR Engine V | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.7 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 372.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-16.0 | f/3.5-4.6 |
Macro focusing range | 10cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,230 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 300s | 2s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) | 1920 x 1080 (50 fps), 1440 x 1080 (50, 25fps), 1280 x 720 (25 fps), 640 x 480 (25 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 251 grams (0.55 lbs) | 149 grams (0.33 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 98 x 60 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1078 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 pictures | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | DB-65 | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, portrait1/ portrait2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $599 | $799 |