Clicky

Ricoh GR II vs Sony W320

Portability
89
Imaging
59
Features
55
Overall
57
Ricoh GR II front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 front
Portability
97
Imaging
36
Features
21
Overall
30

Ricoh GR II vs Sony W320 Key Specs

Ricoh GR II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
  • 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
  • Launched June 2015
  • Replaced the Ricoh GR
Sony W320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
  • 117g - 93 x 52 x 17mm
  • Launched January 2010
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Ricoh GR II vs Sony W320 Overview

Below is a extended overview of the Ricoh GR II vs Sony W320, one being a Large Sensor Compact and the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Ricoh and Sony. The image resolution of the GR II (16MP) and the W320 (14MP) is very similar but the GR II (APS-C) and W320 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor measurements.

Photography Glossary

The GR II was introduced 5 years later than the W320 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony W320 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before delving into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise summation of how the GR II matches up against the W320 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Sony W320

 GR II W320 
LaunchedJune 2015January 2010More recent by 67 months
Focus manually Very precise focus
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1230k230kClearer display (+1000k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony W320 over the Ricoh GR II

 W320 GR II 

Common features in the Ricoh GR II and Sony W320

 GR II W320 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lack of Touch friendly display

Ricoh GR II vs Sony W320 Physical Comparison

For those who are going to lug around your camera, you'll need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GR II enjoys outer dimensions of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") having a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs) while the Sony W320 has measurements of 93mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") with a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).

Take a look at the Ricoh GR II vs Sony W320 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you select at that time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the GR II and the W320.

Ricoh GR II vs Sony W320 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GR II and W320 is 89 and 97 respectively.

Ricoh GR II vs Sony W320 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR II vs Sony W320 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it can be difficult to envision the gap between sensor measurements only by reviewing a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the GR II and W320.

Clearly, each of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The GR II having a larger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Ricoh GR II will deliver extra detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos more aggressively. The younger GR II will have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.

Ricoh GR II vs Sony W320 sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR II vs Sony W320 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR II vs Sony W320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GR II as a Portrait photography camera
Sony W320 as a Portrait photography camera
75
focusing manually
good resolution (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports face detection autofocus
delivers RAW formats
28
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
no manual mode
no external flash support
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Ricoh GR II as a Street photography camera
Sony W320 as a Street photography camera
74
sensor size is good (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
lighter than competitors (251 grams)
great high ISO (25,600)
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
48
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GR II Sports photography details
Sony W320 Sports photography details
50
good resolution (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports tracking autofocus
fixed focal length (28mm)
continuous shooting slow (4.0 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
does not have phase detect autofocus
26
resolution is good (14MP)
max fps very slow (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR II Travel photography highlights
Sony W320 Travel photography highlights
67
lighter than competitors (251g)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
66
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
relatively wide (26mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
does not posses selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.7)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GR II Landscape photography advice
Sony W320 Landscape photography advice
59
focusing manually
good sized screen (3")
good resolution (16MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
great high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (28mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
does not have image stabilization
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
33
relatively wide (26mm)
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.7)
small screen (2.7 inches)
no manual mode
no image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
lack of Time Lapse recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR II Vlogging factors
Sony W320 Vlogging factors
32
supports face detection autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competitors (251g)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
doesn't have external mic support
26
relatively wide (26mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.7)
does not posses selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 resolution)
lack of external mic support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Ricoh GR II vs Sony W320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR II and Sony W320
 Ricoh GR IISony Cyber-shot DSC-W320
General Information
Brand Ricoh Sony
Model type Ricoh GR II Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320
Class Large Sensor Compact Ultracompact
Launched 2015-06-17 2010-01-07
Physical type Large Sensor Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Chip GR Engine V -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 23.7 x 15.7mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 372.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4928 x 3264 4320 x 3240
Highest native ISO 25600 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 9 9
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28mm (1x) 26-105mm (4.0x)
Largest aperture f/2.8-16.0 f/2.7-5.7
Macro focusing range 10cm 4cm
Focal length multiplier 1.5 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3" 2.7"
Display resolution 1,230k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (optional) None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 300 secs 1 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/1600 secs
Continuous shutter rate 4.0 frames/s 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) 4.80 m
Flash modes Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 251g (0.55 lbs) 117g (0.26 lbs)
Physical dimensions 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") 93 x 52 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 23.6 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 13.7 not tested
DXO Low light rating 1078 not tested
Other
Battery life 320 photographs -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID DB-65 NP-BN1
Self timer Yes Yes (2 sec or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Retail cost $599 $269