Ricoh GR III vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
90 Imaging
69 Features
62 Overall
66
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
Ricoh GR III vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Released September 2018
- Older Model is Ricoh GR III
- Renewed by Ricoh GR III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Revealed November 2009
Ricoh GR III vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
Following is a in-depth analysis of the Ricoh GR III vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, former is a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless and both are sold by Ricoh. There is a considerable difference between the sensor resolutions of the GR III (24MP) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) but they use the same exact sensor sizing (APS-C).
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe GR III was launched 9 years after the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving in to a thorough comparison, below is a concise view of how the GR III scores vs the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh GR III vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GR III & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh GR III Gallery & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
GR III | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2018 | November 2009 | More modern by 109 months | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 920k | Clearer screen (+117k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Ricoh GR III
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | GR III |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR III and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
GR III | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Ricoh GR III vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GR III offers outside dimensions of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has proportions of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") along with a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh GR III vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the GR III versus the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the GR III and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 90 and 77 respectively.
Ricoh GR III vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very hard to see the gap between sensor sizes only by looking at specs. The picture below will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the GR III and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Ricoh GR III to give extra detail utilizing its extra 12MP. Higher resolution will help you crop shots a little more aggressively. The more recent GR III is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh GR III vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR III vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
Ricoh GR III | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Ricoh |
Model type | Ricoh GR III | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
Type | Large Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2018-09-25 | 2009-11-10 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 366.6mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4288 x 2848 |
Max native ISO | 102400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 50mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-16 | f/2.5 |
Macro focusing range | 6cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 180s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/3200s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 3.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 257g (0.57 pounds) | 453g (1.00 pounds) |
Dimensions | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 pictures |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $900 | $566 |