Ricoh GR III vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2
90 Imaging
69 Features
62 Overall
66
90 Imaging
40 Features
60 Overall
48
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Launched September 2018
- Superseded the Ricoh GR III
- Replacement is Ricoh GR III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 283g - 133 x 71 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2014
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Overview
The following is a comprehensive overview of the Ricoh GR III vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2, one is a Large Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a big gap among the sensor resolutions of the GR III (24MP) and Galaxy Camera 2 (16MP) and the GR III (APS-C) and Galaxy Camera 2 (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe GR III was launched 4 years after the Galaxy Camera 2 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 being a Compact camera.
Before we go through a detailed comparison, below is a short summation of how the GR III matches up versus the Galaxy Camera 2 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GR III and Samsung Galaxy Camera 2. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR III Gallery and Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Samsung Galaxy Camera 2
GR III | Galaxy Camera 2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2018 | January 2014 | Newer by 58 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 over the Ricoh GR III
Galaxy Camera 2 | GR III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 4.8" | 3" | Larger display (+1.8") |
Common features in the Ricoh GR III and Samsung Galaxy Camera 2
GR III | Galaxy Camera 2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 1037k | Equal display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR III provides external dimensions of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs) whilst the Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 has dimensions of 133mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.2" x 2.8" x 0.7") and a weight of 283 grams (0.62 lbs).
Check the Ricoh GR III vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you select at the time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the GR III and the Galaxy Camera 2.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GR III and Galaxy Camera 2 is 90 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions merely by going through specs. The picture underneath will give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR III and Galaxy Camera 2.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The GR III because of its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Ricoh GR III will produce greater detail utilizing its extra 8MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos far more aggressively. The newer GR III provides a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 Specifications
Ricoh GR III | Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GR III | Samsung Galaxy Camera 2 |
Type | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2018-09-25 | 2014-01-02 |
Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | 1.6GHz Quad-Core Exynos |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 102400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-16 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 6cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 4.8 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,037k dots | 1,037k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | - | HD Super Clear Touch Display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 16 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.80 m |
Flash options | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, fill-in, slow sync, flash off, redeye fix |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 257 grams (0.57 lb) | 283 grams (0.62 lb) |
Dimensions | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 133 x 71 x 19mm (5.2" x 2.8" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 400 images |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | Built-in |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2, 5, or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at release | $900 | $400 |