Clicky

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung HZ10W

Portability
90
Imaging
69
Features
62
Overall
66
Ricoh GR III front
 
Samsung HZ10W front
Portability
90
Imaging
33
Features
27
Overall
30

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung HZ10W Key Specs

Ricoh GR III
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 102400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
  • 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
  • Introduced September 2018
  • Older Model is Ricoh GR III
  • Successor is Ricoh GR III
Samsung HZ10W
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
  • 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
  • Revealed May 2009
  • Alternate Name is WB500
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung HZ10W Overview

Lets take a deeper look at the Ricoh GR III versus Samsung HZ10W, former is a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the GR III (24MP) and HZ10W (10MP) and the GR III (APS-C) and HZ10W (1/2.3") provide different sensor size.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The GR III was released 9 years after the HZ10W which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung HZ10W being a Compact camera.

Before we go into a in depth comparison, here is a simple view of how the GR III grades versus the HZ10W when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Samsung HZ10W

 GR III HZ10W 
RevealedSeptember 2018May 2009Newer by 115 months
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1037k230kCrisper display (+807k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Samsung HZ10W over the Ricoh GR III

 HZ10W GR III 

Common features in the Ricoh GR III and Samsung HZ10W

 GR III HZ10W 
Focus manually Dial exact focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung HZ10W Physical Comparison

In case you're looking to travel with your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and proportions. The Ricoh GR III features outside measurements of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs) and the Samsung HZ10W has measurements of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") along with a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).

Look at the Ricoh GR III versus Samsung HZ10W in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Below is a front view scale comparison of the GR III compared to the HZ10W.

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung HZ10W size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GR III and HZ10W is 90 and 90 respectively.

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung HZ10W top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung HZ10W Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it can be difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions just by viewing technical specs. The pic below will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the GR III and HZ10W.

As you have seen, both the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The GR III due to its larger sensor is going to make getting bokeh easier and the Ricoh GR III will result in more detail as a result of its extra 14 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics more aggressively. The more recent GR III provides a benefit in sensor technology.

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung HZ10W sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung HZ10W Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung HZ10W Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GR III Portrait photography factors
Samsung HZ10W Portrait photography factors
81
manual focus
megapixel count decent (24 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
supports face detect focus
saves RAW files
31
you can focus manually
supports face detect autofocus
lack of manual mode
can't use external flash
megapixel count low (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Ricoh GR III Street photography info
Samsung HZ10W Street photography info
84
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
saves RAW files
features touch focus
lighter than competition (257 grams)
great high ISO (102,400)
screen is fixed
52
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
more heavy than competition in class (249 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GR III as a Sports photography camera
Samsung HZ10W as a Sports photography camera
76
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (24MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
supports tracking focus
supports phase detect auto focus
can't change focal length (28mm)
26
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR III as a Travel photography camera
Samsung HZ10W as a Travel photography camera
69
lighter than competition (257 grams)
features touch focus
megapixel count decent (24MP)
missing Timelapse function
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
54
flash built-in
reasonably wide (24mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
more heavy than competition in class (249 grams)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.3)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GR III Landscape photography advice
Samsung HZ10W Landscape photography advice
69
manual focus
screen size is good (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (24 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
no low pass filter
great high ISO (102,400)
saves RAW files
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (28mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
missing Timelapse function
35
you can focus manually
reasonably wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
lack of manual mode
megapixel count low (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
does not have Timelapse recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR III Vlogging information
Samsung HZ10W Vlogging information
37
has touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition (257g)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
missing microphone support
28
reasonably wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect autofocus
slow max aperture (f3.3)
screen is not selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have microphone port
more heavy than competition in class (249 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung HZ10W Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR III and Samsung HZ10W
 Ricoh GR IIISamsung HZ10W
General Information
Make Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh GR III Samsung HZ10W
Also called as - WB500
Type Large Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2018-09-25 2009-05-14
Body design Large Sensor Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 23.5 x 15.6mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 366.6mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 24 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1 and 3:2 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2
Max resolution 6000 x 4000 3648 x 2432
Max native ISO 102400 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28mm (1x) 24-240mm (10.0x)
Max aperture f/2.8-16 f/3.3-5.8
Macro focusing range 6cm 5cm
Crop factor 1.5 5.9
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of screen 1,037k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (optional) None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 30s 16s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/1500s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance no built-in flash -
Flash options Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB Yes USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 257g (0.57 lbs) 249g (0.55 lbs)
Physical dimensions 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer)
Time lapse recording
Storage media Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at release $900 $300