Clicky

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung HZ50W

Portability
90
Imaging
69
Features
62
Overall
66
Ricoh GR III front
 
Samsung HZ50W front
Portability
70
Imaging
37
Features
44
Overall
39

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung HZ50W Key Specs

Ricoh GR III
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 102400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
  • 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
  • Revealed September 2018
  • Previous Model is Ricoh GR III
  • Later Model is Ricoh GR III
Samsung HZ50W
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 3200 (Push to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
  • 426g - 116 x 83 x 91mm
  • Announced May 2010
  • Additionally referred to as WB5500
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung HZ50W Overview

Lets look a little more in depth at the Ricoh GR III and Samsung HZ50W, former is a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap among the resolutions of the GR III (24MP) and HZ50W (14MP) and the GR III (APS-C) and HZ50W (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor sizes.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The GR III was launched 8 years after the HZ50W which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung HZ50W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before going in to a complete comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the GR III scores versus the HZ50W in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Samsung HZ50W

 GR III HZ50W 
AnnouncedSeptember 2018May 2010Newer by 103 months
Display resolution1037k230kClearer display (+807k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Samsung HZ50W over the Ricoh GR III

 HZ50W GR III 

Common features in the Ricoh GR III and Samsung HZ50W

 GR III HZ50W 
Manual focus Dial precise focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimension3"3"Identical display dimensions
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung HZ50W Physical Comparison

If you're looking to travel with your camera frequently, you will want to factor its weight and size. The Ricoh GR III features external dimensions of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs) while the Samsung HZ50W has specifications of 116mm x 83mm x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") along with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs).

Analyze the Ricoh GR III and Samsung HZ50W in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use at that time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the GR III compared to the HZ50W.

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung HZ50W size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GR III and HZ50W is 90 and 70 respectively.

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung HZ50W top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung HZ50W Sensor Comparison

Normally, it's tough to picture the difference in sensor dimensions merely by seeing a spec sheet. The image underneath may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the GR III and HZ50W.

As you can see, both of those cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The GR III because of its larger sensor is going to make getting bokeh simpler and the Ricoh GR III will provide greater detail utilizing its extra 10MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images much more aggressively. The more recent GR III provides an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung HZ50W sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung HZ50W Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung HZ50W Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GR III as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung HZ50W as a Portrait photography camera
81
has manual focus
decent sensor resolution (24MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
offers face detection focus
exports RAW files
46
focusing manually
good resolution (14 megapixels)
saves RAW files
no external flash support
sensor is small (1/2.3")
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Street photography with Ricoh GR III
Street photography with Samsung HZ50W
84
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
exports RAW files
offers focus by touch
lighter than average (257g)
very good ISO range (102,400)
fixed screen
56
built in image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW files
fixed screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GR III Sports photography information
Samsung HZ50W Sports photography information
76
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (24MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
offers tracking autofocus
sensor has phase detect auto focus
can't change focal length (28mm)
48
great zoom range (26-676mm 26.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (14 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR III Travel photography highlights
Samsung HZ50W Travel photography highlights
69
lighter than average (257 grams)
offers focus by touch
decent sensor resolution (24MP)
lack of Timelapse mode
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
58
good resolution (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
decently wide (26mm)
very long zoom (676mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
display isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GR III Landscape photography information
Samsung HZ50W Landscape photography information
69
has manual focus
nice screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (24 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
does not have low pass filter
very good ISO range (102,400)
exports RAW files
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (28mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
lack of Timelapse mode
51
focusing manually
decently wide (26mm)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (14 megapixels)
saves RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have Time Lapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Ricoh GR III
Vlogging with Samsung HZ50W
37
touchscreen enabled
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detection focus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than average (257g)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
lack of external microphone port
24
decently wide (26mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have mic support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung HZ50W Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR III and Samsung HZ50W
 Ricoh GR IIISamsung HZ50W
General Information
Brand Name Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh GR III Samsung HZ50W
Also called - WB5500
Class Large Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2018-09-25 2010-05-03
Physical type Large Sensor Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 23.5 x 15.6mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 366.6mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 24MP 14MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1 and 3:2 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 6000 x 4000 4320 x 3240
Max native ISO 102400 3200
Max boosted ISO - 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 64
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28mm (1x) 26-676mm (26.0x)
Highest aperture f/2.8-16 f/2.8-5.0
Macro focus range 6cm 10cm
Focal length multiplier 1.5 5.9
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 1,037k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (optional) Electronic
Features
Slowest shutter speed 30 seconds 16 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range no built-in flash 5.60 m
Flash options Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB Yes USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 257 gr (0.57 lbs) 426 gr (0.94 lbs)
Dimensions 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") 116 x 83 x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model - SLB-11A
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) SC/SDHC, Internal
Card slots One One
Cost at launch $900 $250