Ricoh GR III vs Samsung HZ50W
90 Imaging
69 Features
62 Overall
66
70 Imaging
37 Features
44 Overall
39
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung HZ50W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Revealed September 2018
- Previous Model is Ricoh GR III
- Later Model is Ricoh GR III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 426g - 116 x 83 x 91mm
- Announced May 2010
- Additionally referred to as WB5500
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung HZ50W Overview
Lets look a little more in depth at the Ricoh GR III and Samsung HZ50W, former is a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap among the resolutions of the GR III (24MP) and HZ50W (14MP) and the GR III (APS-C) and HZ50W (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe GR III was launched 8 years after the HZ50W which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung HZ50W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going in to a complete comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the GR III scores versus the HZ50W in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung HZ50W Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh GR III & Samsung HZ50W. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh GR III Gallery & Samsung HZ50W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Samsung HZ50W
GR III | HZ50W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2018 | May 2010 | Newer by 103 months | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 230k | Clearer display (+807k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ50W over the Ricoh GR III
HZ50W | GR III |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR III and Samsung HZ50W
GR III | HZ50W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung HZ50W Physical Comparison
If you're looking to travel with your camera frequently, you will want to factor its weight and size. The Ricoh GR III features external dimensions of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs) while the Samsung HZ50W has specifications of 116mm x 83mm x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") along with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh GR III and Samsung HZ50W in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use at that time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the GR III compared to the HZ50W.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GR III and HZ50W is 90 and 70 respectively.
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung HZ50W Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to picture the difference in sensor dimensions merely by seeing a spec sheet. The image underneath may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the GR III and HZ50W.
As you can see, both of those cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The GR III because of its larger sensor is going to make getting bokeh simpler and the Ricoh GR III will provide greater detail utilizing its extra 10MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images much more aggressively. The more recent GR III provides an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung HZ50W Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung HZ50W Specifications
Ricoh GR III | Samsung HZ50W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GR III | Samsung HZ50W |
Also called | - | WB5500 |
Class | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2018-09-25 | 2010-05-03 |
Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 366.6mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 102400 | 3200 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 26-676mm (26.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-16 | f/2.8-5.0 |
Macro focus range | 6cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,037k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | Electronic |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 16 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 5.60 m |
Flash options | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 257 gr (0.57 lbs) | 426 gr (0.94 lbs) |
Dimensions | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 116 x 83 x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | SC/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $900 | $250 |