Ricoh GR III vs Samsung SL102
90 Imaging
69 Features
62 Overall
66
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Announced September 2018
- Superseded the Ricoh GR III
- New Model is Ricoh GR III
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
- Also Known as ES55
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Ricoh GR III vs Samsung SL102, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the GR III (24MP) and SL102 (10MP) and the GR III (APS-C) and SL102 (1/2.3") posses different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe GR III was brought out 9 years later than the SL102 and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the GR III matches up versus the SL102 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GR III & Samsung SL102. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR III Gallery & Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Samsung SL102
GR III | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2018 | January 2009 | More recent by 119 months | |
Focus manually | More accurate focusing | |||
Screen size | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 230k | Sharper screen (+807k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Ricoh GR III
SL102 | GR III |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR III and Samsung SL102
GR III | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera, you are going to need to consider its weight and volume. The Ricoh GR III has got external measurements of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs) and the Samsung SL102 has sizing of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh GR III vs Samsung SL102 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the GR III and the SL102.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the GR III and SL102 is 90 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very tough to picture the difference between sensor measurements purely by checking specs. The graphic underneath might provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the GR III and SL102.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The GR III featuring a bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh less difficult and the Ricoh GR III will give more detail having its extra 14MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures way more aggressively. The younger GR III should have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
Ricoh GR III | Samsung SL102 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GR III | Samsung SL102 |
Also called | - | ES55 |
Category | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2018-09-25 | 2009-01-08 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 102400 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-16 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 6cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,037k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 8s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1500s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
Flash settings | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 257g (0.57 pounds) | 116g (0.26 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $900 | $130 |