Clicky

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung SL102

Portability
90
Imaging
69
Features
62
Overall
66
Ricoh GR III front
 
Samsung SL102 front
Portability
96
Imaging
33
Features
21
Overall
28

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs

Ricoh GR III
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 102400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
  • 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
  • Announced September 2018
  • Superseded the Ricoh GR III
  • New Model is Ricoh GR III
Samsung SL102
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-105mm (F) lens
  • 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
  • Introduced January 2009
  • Also Known as ES55
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung SL102 Overview

Let's look a bit more closely at the Ricoh GR III vs Samsung SL102, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the GR III (24MP) and SL102 (10MP) and the GR III (APS-C) and SL102 (1/2.3") posses different sensor size.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The GR III was brought out 9 years later than the SL102 and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera.

Before going right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the GR III matches up versus the SL102 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Samsung SL102

 GR III SL102 
IntroducedSeptember 2018January 2009More recent by 119 months
Focus manually More accurate focusing
Screen size3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution1037k230kSharper screen (+807k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Ricoh GR III

 SL102 GR III 

Common features in the Ricoh GR III and Samsung SL102

 GR III SL102 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison

When you are intending to lug around your camera, you are going to need to consider its weight and volume. The Ricoh GR III has got external measurements of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs) and the Samsung SL102 has sizing of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).

Analyze the Ricoh GR III vs Samsung SL102 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the GR III and the SL102.

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung SL102 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the GR III and SL102 is 90 and 96 respectively.

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung SL102 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is very tough to picture the difference between sensor measurements purely by checking specs. The graphic underneath might provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the GR III and SL102.

As you can plainly see, both the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The GR III featuring a bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh less difficult and the Ricoh GR III will give more detail having its extra 14MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures way more aggressively. The younger GR III should have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung SL102 sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung SL102 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GR III Portrait photography info
Samsung SL102 Portrait photography info
81
you can focus manually
decent sensor resolution (24MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
offers face detect focusing
supports RAW formats
25
comes with face detection autofocus
no manual focus
no manual control
cannot use external flash
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Ricoh GR III as a Street photography camera
Samsung SL102 as a Street photography camera
84
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
features focus by touch
lighter than competition in class (257 grams)
good ISO range (102,400)
no articulating screen
55
lighter than competition (116g)
no moving screen
no image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GR III Sports photography factors
Samsung SL102 Sports photography factors
76
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (24MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
offers tracking focus
supports phase detect AF
can't change focal length (28mm)
16
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR III Travel photography information
Samsung SL102 Travel photography information
69
lighter than competition in class (257g)
features focus by touch
decent sensor resolution (24 megapixels)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
62
lighter than competition (116 grams)
flash built-in
good maximum aperture (f)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
megapixel count low (10MP)
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (35mm)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Ricoh GR III
Landscape photography with Samsung SL102
69
you can focus manually
pretty good screen size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (24 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
does not have low pass filter
good ISO range (102,400)
supports RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (28mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
27
good maximum aperture (f)
no manual focus
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
tiny screen (2.5 inch)
no manual control
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
doesn't have Timelapse mode
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Ricoh GR III
Vlogging with Samsung SL102
37
screen is touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detect focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competition in class (257 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
doesn't have mic jack
30
good maximum aperture (f)
comes with face detection autofocus
lighter than competition (116g)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
display is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 pxls)
doesn't have external microphone jack
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung SL102 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR III and Samsung SL102
 Ricoh GR IIISamsung SL102
General Information
Manufacturer Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh GR III Samsung SL102
Also called - ES55
Category Large Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2018-09-25 2009-01-08
Body design Large Sensor Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 23.5 x 15.6mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 366.6mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 24MP 10MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1 and 3:2 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 6000 x 4000 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 102400 1600
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28mm (1x) 35-105mm (3.0x)
Max aperture f/2.8-16 -
Macro focusing distance 6cm 10cm
Crop factor 1.5 5.9
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inches 2.5 inches
Resolution of display 1,037k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (optional) None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 30s 8s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/1500s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance no built-in flash -
Flash settings Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB Yes USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 257g (0.57 pounds) 116g (0.26 pounds)
Physical dimensions 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer)
Time lapse feature
Storage media Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at launch $900 $130