Ricoh GR III vs Samsung SL202
90 Imaging
69 Features
62 Overall
66
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Revealed September 2018
- Replaced the Ricoh GR III
- Refreshed by Ricoh GR III
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Launched February 2009
- Also Known as PL50
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Below is a comprehensive review of the Ricoh GR III and Samsung SL202, one being a Large Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a sizeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the GR III (24MP) and SL202 (10MP) and the GR III (APS-C) and SL202 (1/2.3") offer different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe GR III was announced 9 years later than the SL202 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung SL202 being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a in depth comparison, here is a brief overview of how the GR III grades versus the SL202 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GR III and Samsung SL202. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR III Gallery and Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Samsung SL202
GR III | SL202 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2018 | February 2009 | More recent by 117 months | |
Focus manually | Dial precise focus | |||
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 230k | Clearer display (+807k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Ricoh GR III
SL202 | GR III |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh GR III and Samsung SL202
GR III | SL202 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
If you are going to lug around your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GR III provides physical measurements of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs) while the Samsung SL202 has dimensions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check the Ricoh GR III and Samsung SL202 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have attached at that time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the GR III and the SL202.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GR III and SL202 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements just by checking out technical specs. The visual here will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the GR III and SL202.
As you can tell, the two cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The GR III with its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Ricoh GR III will provide extra detail with its extra 14 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The younger GR III provides an edge in sensor innovation.
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
Ricoh GR III | Samsung SL202 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GR III | Samsung SL202 |
Also Known as | - | PL50 |
Class | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2018-09-25 | 2009-02-17 |
Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 102400 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-16 | f/2.8-5.7 |
Macro focus distance | 6cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Display resolution | 1,037 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 8 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.60 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 257 grams (0.57 lb) | 168 grams (0.37 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $900 | $140 |