Clicky

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung ST150F

Portability
90
Imaging
69
Features
62
Overall
66
Ricoh GR III front
 
Samsung ST150F front
Portability
96
Imaging
40
Features
30
Overall
36

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung ST150F Key Specs

Ricoh GR III
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 102400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
  • 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
  • Announced September 2018
  • Previous Model is Ricoh GR III
  • Replacement is Ricoh GR III
Samsung ST150F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
  • 114g - 94 x 58 x 18mm
  • Released January 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung ST150F Overview

Below is a in-depth overview of the Ricoh GR III versus Samsung ST150F, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the GR III (24MP) and ST150F (16MP) and the GR III (APS-C) and ST150F (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor sizing.

Photography Glossary

The GR III was released 5 years later than the ST150F and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung ST150F being a Compact camera.

Before delving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief summation of how the GR III grades versus the ST150F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Samsung ST150F

 GR III ST150F 
ReleasedSeptember 2018January 2013More recent by 70 months
Manual focus Very exact focusing
Screen resolution1037k230kClearer screen (+807k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Samsung ST150F over the Ricoh GR III

 ST150F GR III 

Common features in the Ricoh GR III and Samsung ST150F

 GR III ST150F 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen measurement
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung ST150F Physical Comparison

In case you're planning to lug around your camera regularly, you have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GR III features physical measurements of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs) and the Samsung ST150F has proportions of 94mm x 58mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 114 grams (0.25 lbs).

Check the Ricoh GR III versus Samsung ST150F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with during that time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the GR III and the ST150F.

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung ST150F size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GR III and ST150F is 90 and 96 respectively.

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung ST150F top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung ST150F Sensor Comparison

More often than not, its difficult to visualise the difference between sensor measurements just by reading specs. The graphic here should provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the GR III and ST150F.

All in all, both of the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The GR III due to its bigger sensor will make getting bokeh easier and the Ricoh GR III will offer you more detail as a result of its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The newer GR III is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung ST150F sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung ST150F Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung ST150F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GR III Portrait photography information
Samsung ST150F Portrait photography information
81
you can focus manually
good resolution (24 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
includes face detect focus
exports RAW formats
35
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
offers face detection focusing
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
can't use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Ricoh GR III Street photography features
Samsung ST150F Street photography features
84
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
comes with focus via touch
lighter than average in class (257g)
above average ISO range (102,400)
no moving screen
56
lighter than competition in class (114g)
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GR III Sports photography information
Samsung ST150F Sports photography information
76
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (24 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
includes tracking focus
comes with phase detect auto focus
fixed focal length (28mm)
36
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
offers tracking autofocus
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR III Travel photography factors
Samsung ST150F Travel photography factors
69
lighter than average in class (257g)
comes with focus via touch
good resolution (24 megapixels)
missing Time Lapse recording
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
69
lighter than competition in class (114 grams)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
flash built-in
really wide (25mm)
no Timelapse function
does not contain selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GR III Landscape photography advice
Samsung ST150F Landscape photography advice
69
you can focus manually
screen is a good size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (24MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
does not have anti aliasing filter
above average ISO range (102,400)
exports RAW formats
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (28mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
missing Time Lapse recording
39
really wide (25mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
no manual control
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
no Timelapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Ricoh GR III
Vlogging with Samsung ST150F
37
built-in touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than average in class (257g)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
missing mic socket
30
really wide (25mm)
offers face detection focusing
lighter than competition in class (114 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
no external microphone port
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung ST150F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR III and Samsung ST150F
 Ricoh GR IIISamsung ST150F
General Information
Manufacturer Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh GR III Samsung ST150F
Type Large Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2018-09-25 2013-01-07
Body design Large Sensor Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 23.5 x 15.6mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 366.6mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 24 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1 and 3:2 -
Peak resolution 6000 x 4000 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 102400 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28mm (1x) 25-125mm (5.0x)
Max aperture f/2.8-16 f/2.5-6.3
Macro focus distance 6cm -
Crop factor 1.5 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 1,037k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen tech - QVGA TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (optional) None
Features
Min shutter speed 30s 1s
Max shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range no built-in flash -
Flash options Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye -
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB Yes USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 257 grams (0.57 lbs) 114 grams (0.25 lbs)
Dimensions 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") 94 x 58 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes Yes
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC
Storage slots One One
Launch pricing $900 $300