Ricoh GR III vs Samsung ST600
90 Imaging
69 Features
62 Overall
66
95 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung ST600 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Introduced September 2018
- Superseded the Ricoh GR III
- Newer Model is Ricoh GR III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-135mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 150g - 104 x 60 x 20mm
- Announced January 2010
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung ST600 Overview
Here, we will be comparing the Ricoh GR III versus Samsung ST600, one being a Large Sensor Compact and the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the GR III (24MP) and ST600 (14MP) and the GR III (APS-C) and ST600 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe GR III was introduced 8 years later than the ST600 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung ST600 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick summary of how the GR III scores versus the ST600 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung ST600 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GR III and Samsung ST600. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh GR III Gallery and Samsung ST600 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Samsung ST600
GR III | ST600 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2018 | January 2010 | Fresher by 107 months | |
Manual focus | More accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST600 over the Ricoh GR III
ST600 | GR III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 1152k | 1037k | Sharper screen (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh GR III and Samsung ST600
GR III | ST600 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung ST600 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to consider its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GR III has got physical dimensions of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs) while the Samsung ST600 has proportions of 104mm x 60mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh GR III versus Samsung ST600 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the GR III versus the ST600.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GR III and ST600 is 90 and 95 respectively.
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung ST600 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to see the difference between sensor sizing simply by going over specs. The graphic here may give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the GR III and ST600.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The GR III with its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Ricoh GR III will deliver more detail using its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The younger GR III will have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung ST600 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung ST600 Specifications
Ricoh GR III | Samsung ST600 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GR III | Samsung ST600 |
Type | Large Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2018-09-25 | 2010-01-06 |
Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 102400 | 4800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 27-135mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-16 | f/3.3-5.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 6cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dots | 1,152 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 8s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1500s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 5.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 257 gr (0.57 pounds) | 150 gr (0.33 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 104 x 60 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | SLB07 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $900 | $330 |