Ricoh GR III vs Samsung TL210
90 Imaging
69 Features
62 Overall
66
94 Imaging
35 Features
27 Overall
31
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung TL210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Revealed September 2018
- Previous Model is Ricoh GR III
- Refreshed by Ricoh GR III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-135mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 177g - 99 x 59 x 20mm
- Announced January 2010
- Also referred to as PL150
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung TL210 Overview
Let's look much closer at the Ricoh GR III versus Samsung TL210, one is a Large Sensor Compact and the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There is a big difference between the resolutions of the GR III (24MP) and TL210 (12MP) and the GR III (APS-C) and TL210 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor size.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe GR III was released 8 years after the TL210 which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung TL210 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving right into a thorough comparison, here is a concise overview of how the GR III grades against the TL210 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung TL210 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh GR III and Samsung TL210. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh GR III Gallery and Samsung TL210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Samsung TL210
GR III | TL210 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2018 | January 2010 | More modern by 107 months | |
Focus manually | More exact focusing | |||
Screen resolution | 1037k | 230k | Sharper screen (+807k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL210 over the Ricoh GR III
TL210 | GR III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Common features in the Ricoh GR III and Samsung TL210
GR III | TL210 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung TL210 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to think about its weight and volume. The Ricoh GR III provides outside measurements of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL210 has sizing of 99mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") with a weight of 177 grams (0.39 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh GR III versus Samsung TL210 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you choose at that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the GR III versus the TL210.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the GR III and TL210 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung TL210 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes just by looking at a spec sheet. The picture underneath should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the GR III and TL210.
As you can see, both the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The GR III featuring a bigger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Ricoh GR III will give you extra detail as a result of its extra 12MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The younger GR III will have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung TL210 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GR III vs Samsung TL210 Specifications
Ricoh GR III | Samsung TL210 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GR III | Samsung TL210 |
Other name | - | PL150 |
Class | Large Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2018-09-25 | 2010-01-06 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 366.6mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 102400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 27-135mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-16 | f/3.5-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 6cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 8 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.40 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 257 grams (0.57 pounds) | 177 grams (0.39 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 99 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | SLB-07B |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $900 | $230 |