Clicky

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung TL225

Portability
90
Imaging
69
Features
62
Overall
66
Ricoh GR III front
 
Samsung TL225 front
Portability
94
Imaging
35
Features
33
Overall
34

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung TL225 Key Specs

Ricoh GR III
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 102400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
  • 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
  • Revealed September 2018
  • Previous Model is Ricoh GR III
  • Successor is Ricoh GR III
Samsung TL225
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
  • 187g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
  • Launched August 2009
  • Additionally Known as ST550
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung TL225 Overview

Here is a extensive analysis of the Ricoh GR III versus Samsung TL225, one being a Large Sensor Compact and the other is a Ultracompact by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a sizeable gap among the image resolutions of the GR III (24MP) and TL225 (12MP) and the GR III (APS-C) and TL225 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor size.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The GR III was manufactured 9 years later than the TL225 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Samsung TL225 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before going in to a full comparison, below is a simple overview of how the GR III matches up against the TL225 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Samsung TL225

 GR III TL225 
LaunchedSeptember 2018August 2009Fresher by 111 months
Manually focus Dial accurate focusing

Reasons to pick Samsung TL225 over the Ricoh GR III

 TL225 GR III 
Display dimension3.5"3"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution1152k1037kCrisper display (+115k dot)

Common features in the Ricoh GR III and Samsung TL225

 GR III TL225 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch display Easily navigate

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung TL225 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to carry your camera, you're going to have to think about its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GR III provides outside measurements of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs) while the Samsung TL225 has proportions of 100mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") having a weight of 187 grams (0.41 lbs).

Check out the Ricoh GR III versus Samsung TL225 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the GR III compared to the TL225.

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung TL225 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GR III and TL225 is 90 and 94 respectively.

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung TL225 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung TL225 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is very difficult to picture the difference in sensor sizing merely by seeing specifications. The graphic below will provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the GR III and TL225.

Plainly, the 2 cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The GR III featuring a larger sensor is going to make getting bokeh simpler and the Ricoh GR III will show more detail due to its extra 12 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The newer GR III should have a benefit in sensor tech.

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung TL225 sensor size comparison

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung TL225 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung TL225 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh GR III Portrait photography features
Samsung TL225 Portrait photography features
81
has manual focus
megapixel count good (24MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
has face detect autofocus
exports RAW files
21
no manual focus
manual mode not possible
can't use external flash
low MP (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Street photography with Ricoh GR III
Street photography with Samsung TL225
84
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
offers touch to focus
lighter than competition in class (257 grams)
above average high ISO (102,400)
screen does not articulate
59
has image stabilization (Optical)
comes with focus via touch
no articulating screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
heavier than competition in class (187 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Ricoh GR III Sports photography factors
Samsung TL225 Sports photography factors
76
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (24 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
has tracking focus
sensor has phase detect autofocus
can't change focal length (28mm)
27
has image stabilization (Optical)
no shutter priority mode
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Ricoh GR III Travel photography factors
Samsung TL225 Travel photography factors
69
lighter than competition in class (257 grams)
offers touch to focus
megapixel count good (24MP)
lack of Time Lapse function
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
59
comes with focus via touch
has built in flash
reasonably wide (27mm)
no Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition in class (187g)
low MP (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh GR III Landscape photography details
Samsung TL225 Landscape photography details
69
has manual focus
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (24 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
no anti-alias filter
above average high ISO (102,400)
exports RAW files
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (28mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
lack of Time Lapse function
37
reasonably wide (27mm)
bigger than average screen (3.5 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
manual mode not possible
low MP (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
no Time Lapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh GR III Vlogging information
Samsung TL225 Vlogging information
37
touchscreen enabled
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect autofocus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition in class (257g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of mic socket
29
reasonably wide (27mm)
built-in touchscreen
has image stabilization (Optical)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
no mic port
heavier than competition in class (187g)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Ricoh GR III vs Samsung TL225 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GR III and Samsung TL225
 Ricoh GR IIISamsung TL225
General Information
Manufacturer Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh GR III Samsung TL225
Also referred to as - ST550
Category Large Sensor Compact Ultracompact
Revealed 2018-09-25 2009-08-13
Body design Large Sensor Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 23.5 x 15.6mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 366.6mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 24MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1 and 3:2 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 6000 x 4000 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 102400 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28mm (1x) 27-124mm (4.6x)
Largest aperture f/2.8-16 f/3.5-5.9
Macro focus range 6cm 5cm
Crop factor 1.5 5.9
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 3.5 inches
Resolution of screen 1,037 thousand dot 1,152 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (optional) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 30s 8s
Highest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range no built-in flash 3.40 m
Flash options Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB Yes USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 257g (0.57 lb) 187g (0.41 lb)
Dimensions 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model - SLB-07A
Self timer Yes Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Launch price $900 $488